<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984</id><updated>2012-02-14T00:32:00.603-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Echelon Wealth Strategies</title><subtitle type='html'>Echelon Wealth Strategies provides wealth management solutions to affluent clients. We act as our clients’ private chief financial officer, advising them on all aspects of their financial lives with integrity and care so that they may pursue their greatest financial goals.</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default?start-index=101&amp;max-results=100'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>723</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-5837462480979172476</id><published>2012-02-14T00:32:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-02-14T00:32:00.631-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The White House Forecasts the Economy</title><content type='html'>As part of the budget released by the Obama Administration yesterday's, the president's staff also released a set of macroeconomic forecasts underpinning their budget projections. Some of the highlights:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;* The White House predicts that GDP will grow 2.7 percent in 2012. That's up slightly from the 2.6 percent forecast issued last September. The administration also sees 3 percent growth in 2013, moving up to 3.6 percent in 2015 and 4.1 percent in 2016.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;* The yield on ten-year Treasury notes - currently just under 2 percent - is expected to inch upward to 2.8 percent by the end of this year, 3.5 percent in 2013, and 3.9 percent in 2014.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;* The consumer price index is predicted to go up to 2.2 percent this year, before settling at 1.9 percent in 2013 and 2 percent in 2014.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-5837462480979172476?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/5837462480979172476/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/02/white-house-forecasts-economy.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/5837462480979172476'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/5837462480979172476'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/02/white-house-forecasts-economy.html' title='The White House Forecasts the Economy'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-8590085524995155415</id><published>2012-02-13T01:15:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-02-13T01:15:00.184-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Signs of Optimism</title><content type='html'>There's been a lot of renewed optimism about America's economy and stock markets going around lately. A new survey of financial advisors around the country shows that such bullishness is growing, even in recent weeks. In a survey that talked to more than 100 advisors, the majority of which manage more than $50 million in assets, around 90 percent said they expect the S&amp;amp;P 500 to show a positive gain on the year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That number is up 18 percentage points from when a similar survey was conducted in mid-January. Part of that, of course, reflects the fact that the S&amp;amp;P 500 is already up 6.8 percent on the year, and would require a downturn to finish the year in negative territory. But part of it is also confidence surrounding the growing signs of strength of the economy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In fact, the majority of advisors now think that the S&amp;amp;P isn't just headed for positive territory but for solid growth in 2012. Roughly 63 percent of those surveyed expect the index to gain 5 percent or more this year.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-8590085524995155415?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/8590085524995155415/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/02/signs-of-optimism.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8590085524995155415'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8590085524995155415'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/02/signs-of-optimism.html' title='Signs of Optimism'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-2683068024097824384</id><published>2012-02-10T01:56:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-02-10T01:56:00.657-08:00</updated><title type='text'>A Bogus Warning from the IRS</title><content type='html'>There's an email going around, purporting to be from the IRS, informing citizens that they have incurred a penalty because they didn't file their tax return before January 30th of this year. Couched in fairly official-sounding language, the notice threatens a fee of $10,000 if forms are filed late. &lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;As phishing schemes go, this is a fairly lame one. Everyone knows that the IRS deadline is April 15th, and that January 30th has nothing to do with the taxpaying year. (Actually, this year the deadline is April 17th, due to weekends and holidays.) It's possible that some recipients will become confused and think that last year's return somehow didn't reach its proper destination by January 30th of this year, but that's not relevant either.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;More to the point, the IRS is very clear about the fact that it does not initiate contact with taxpayers via email. It makes no difference if it's February 10th or April 15th: You will not get any legitimate email from the IRS. So if you do see something like that in your in-box, feel free to delete it. The sender is up to no good.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-2683068024097824384?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/2683068024097824384/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/02/bogus-warning-from-irs.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/2683068024097824384'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/2683068024097824384'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/02/bogus-warning-from-irs.html' title='A Bogus Warning from the IRS'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-601861417825114507</id><published>2012-02-09T01:40:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-02-09T01:40:00.146-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Stocks on the Rebound</title><content type='html'>Which stock in the Standard &amp;amp; Poor's 500 has returned the most so far in 2012? It's Netflix, the same company that was so beaten down last year after the disastrous and quickly rescinded announcement that it was splitting itself into two companies. After losing 74 percent of its value in the last six months of 2011, Netflix is up 80 percent so far in 2012.&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;There have been a lot of stories like that in the early part of this year. Netflix was the second-biggest loser among the S&amp;amp;P 500 stocks in the second half of 2011, trailing only the renewable-energy company First Solar. Like Netflix, First Solar has rebounded strong in 2012, returning 36 percent so far.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Other stocks in that same category: Sears Holdings lost 56 percent of its value in the second half of 2011, but is up 54 percent in 2012. Bank of America lost 50 percent of its value in the second half of 2011, but is up 46 percent so far in 2012. Truly, past performance is no guarantee of future results.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-601861417825114507?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/601861417825114507/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/02/stocks-on-rebound.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/601861417825114507'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/601861417825114507'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/02/stocks-on-rebound.html' title='Stocks on the Rebound'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-2583031110533289737</id><published>2012-02-08T01:54:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-02-08T01:54:00.091-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Consumer Credit Explodes</title><content type='html'>Here's another sign that the economy is expanding, maybe even much faster than anticipated: The Federal Reserve announced yesterday that consumer credit expanded by $19 billion in December, as Americans once again felt comfortable borrowing money. To show what a surprise that is, the consensus of economists polled by Bloomberg before the figure was announced expected a rise of just $7 billion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The December gain followed an even bigger increase in consumer credit in November, when the figure rose by more than $20 billion. Put together, November and December represented the largest two-month increase in new credit since October and November of 2001.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Revolving debt, mostly from credit cards, grew by $2.76 billion, which is actually down slightly from November. The real driver was non-revolving debt, which includes auto and education loans. The December increase in that category of $16.6 billion was the biggest such monthly gain in that category since November 2001.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-2583031110533289737?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/2583031110533289737/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/02/consumer-credit-explodes.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/2583031110533289737'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/2583031110533289737'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/02/consumer-credit-explodes.html' title='Consumer Credit Explodes'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-8469001635998862497</id><published>2012-02-07T00:47:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-02-07T00:47:00.422-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Are Corporate Profits Slowing?</title><content type='html'>Corporate earnings have been on a roll for nearly three years now, but there are signs that the string of good fortune may be coming to an end. The profit margin for the S&amp;amp;P 500 companies, as the &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Wall Street Journal&lt;/span&gt; reported yesterday, dropped from 8.95 percent in the second quarter of 2011 to 8.23 percent so far for companies that have reported profits for the fourth quarter. That's the biggest drop we've seen since the onset of the financial crisis.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We're also seeing fewer companies meet their earnings estimates. As you probably know, more than half of all corporations exceed the consensus estimates that Wall Street analysts issue for their earnings report. This year, 60 percent of the S&amp;amp;P 500 firms are beating the analysts' projections - which may seem like a lot, but it's the lowest that number has been since 2008.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That's not to deny that we've come a long way since the financial crisis. The S&amp;amp;P 500 is on track to earn $24.20 a share this quarter; back in the fourth quarter of 2008, it bottomed out at $4.42 a share.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-8469001635998862497?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/8469001635998862497/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/02/are-corporate-profits-slowing.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8469001635998862497'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8469001635998862497'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/02/are-corporate-profits-slowing.html' title='Are Corporate Profits Slowing?'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-3672233943477793134</id><published>2012-02-06T02:10:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-02-06T02:10:00.985-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Facebook's Future</title><content type='html'>Facebook announced this week that it intends to have an initial public offering later this spring - one that has already been acclaimed as the richest IPO in history. The company's value is expected to be around the $100 billion mark, although it will be raising only around $5 billion in the IPO. According to the papers filed with the SEC, Facebook made a cool $1 billion in profits last year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But will this highly anticipated IPO be a long-term hit with investors? That's still up in the air. The average IPO between 1980 and 2009 saw an 18 percent jump on its first day - but gained only 21 percent over the following three years. That's not even enough to beat the overall average market return.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Facebook's hope is that it turns out to be the next Google - an Internet highflyer that didn't crash and burn, but rather settled in for the long haul. On the day of its IPO in 2004,  Google's stock got the customary first-day 18 percent pop - then gained more than 400 percent over the next three years.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-3672233943477793134?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/3672233943477793134/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/02/facebooks-future.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/3672233943477793134'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/3672233943477793134'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/02/facebooks-future.html' title='Facebook&apos;s Future'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-6812877149665524586</id><published>2012-02-03T06:07:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-02-03T06:32:33.399-08:00</updated><title type='text'>2012 Starts With a Bang</title><content type='html'>The jobs numbers released this morning show that 2012 has gotten off with a bang: The economy added 243,000 jobs in January, the most for any month in almost a year. The unemployment rate dropped from 8.5 percent to 8.3 percent; that's the lowest that figure has been since February 2009. The private sector added 257,00 jobs in January.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The employment categories showing the biggest gains were professional and business services, which added 70,000 jobs; manufacturing, which added 50,000 jobs; and hospitality, which added 44,000. The hospitality sector, driven by what the government calls "food service and drinking places," has added 487,000 jobs to the economy over the past year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The economy has now added at least 200,000 jobs in back-to-back months, and at least 100,000 jobs in five straight months. It's probably premature to say we're in full recovery, since we've been here before: The economy added more than 200,000 jobs in each of the three months from February to April of last year, before faltering over the summer. But we're certainly moving in the right direction.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-6812877149665524586?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/6812877149665524586/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/02/2012-starts-with-bang.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/6812877149665524586'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/6812877149665524586'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/02/2012-starts-with-bang.html' title='2012 Starts With a Bang'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-8606743974181341926</id><published>2012-02-02T01:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-02-02T01:00:09.387-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Coming Decade</title><content type='html'>It's often said that no one really knows where the stock market is going at any given time. So it seems like a fool's errand to try to predict the market for the next ten years. But the mutual fund giant Vanguard is attempting to do so anyway. Here are some aspects of their decade-long forecast, just out this week:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;* Global stock markets are projected to return between 6 and 9 percent annually, slightly below the long-term historical average of 9.8 percent. Vanguard sees little difference in long-term returns between domestic stocks and foreign ones.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;* The taxable U.S. bond market is forecast to return somewhere between 1.5 and 2 percent per year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;* Inflation will remain right around where it is today, in the 2 to 3 percent range.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;* The American economy is projected to grow at 2 to 3 percent annually, again right about where it is today.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-8606743974181341926?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/8606743974181341926/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/02/coming-decade.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8606743974181341926'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8606743974181341926'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/02/coming-decade.html' title='The Coming Decade'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-7184876349169622274</id><published>2012-02-01T01:12:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-02-01T01:12:00.529-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Property Taxes in New Jersey</title><content type='html'>In case you missed the news, it came out this week that New Jersey holds a rather unenviable distinction: We've got the highest property taxes in the nation, again this year. After a 4.1 percent hike in real estate taxes, the average property-tax bill in the Garden State rose by 2.4 percent in 2011. The end result: the final average bill was $7,519 in 2011. That's up 20 percent from 2009. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The good news is that the 2.4 percent average increase was the smallest that figure has been in over a decade. The effective property-tax rate was rising at around 7 percent per year from 2004 to 2006.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's been a long ten years for taxpayers. Since 2001, overall, property taxes have increased by a stunning 66 percent in New Jersey. The average Garden Stater's property-tax bill in 2001 was $4,661. That probably felt like a lot back then, but it seems pretty enviable now.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-7184876349169622274?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/7184876349169622274/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/02/property-taxes-in-new-jersey.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7184876349169622274'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7184876349169622274'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/02/property-taxes-in-new-jersey.html' title='Property Taxes in New Jersey'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-7711707472240626302</id><published>2012-01-31T01:18:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-31T01:18:00.286-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Why Are Stocks Still Low?</title><content type='html'>Corporate profits are headed for a record high this year; according to a survey by Bloomberg News, profits for the S&amp;amp;P 500 are expected to reach $104.78 per share. That would mean that profits had increased by a stunning 125 percent since the beginning of 2009. The incredible speed with which they're growing may explain why stocks have failed to keep pace.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The price/earnings ratio for the S&amp;amp;P 500 as a whole is now at 13.7. The historic mean for that number, figured since 1954, is 16.4, which the S&amp;amp;P has traded below ever since May 13, 2010, the day of the infamous "flash crash." That's 446 consecutive days in which stocks have been trading below their historic norms, the longest such stretch we've had since 1986.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There seem to be two primary explanations for this phenomenon. One: Investors haven't really processed the growth in corporate profits yet, so they haven't yet incorporated that information into stock pricing. Two: Investors don't really trust this economy or this market, at least not yet. It's probably a bit of both.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-7711707472240626302?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/7711707472240626302/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/why-are-stocks-still-low.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7711707472240626302'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7711707472240626302'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/why-are-stocks-still-low.html' title='Why Are Stocks Still Low?'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-1666445801869892081</id><published>2012-01-30T01:10:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-30T01:10:00.221-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Looking Back at the Fourth Quarter</title><content type='html'>On Friday, the Bureau of Economic Analysis released its first estimate of growth for the fourth quarter of 2011, and the news was good but not great: GDP increased at 2.8 percent. That's up from the 1.8 percent growth we had in the third quarter, and the highest quarterly figure we've seen since the second quarter of 2010. It also meant, though, that for the entire year, GDP growth was 1.7 percent, which is fairly anemic.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The concern over that fourth-quarter number - aside from the fact that everyone would like to see it be a little bit higher - is that much of the growth came from increases in inventories. If you subtract inventory growth from overall GDP growth, you see that the real growth in sales was just 0.8 percent in the fourth quarter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The most positive way to look at the fourth quarter is to separate the figure into public and private sector growth. While government continues to shrink, the private sector actually grew at a robust 4.7 percent for the quarter. That's a sign of real strength for this economy.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-1666445801869892081?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/1666445801869892081/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/looking-back-at-fourth-quarter.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/1666445801869892081'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/1666445801869892081'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/looking-back-at-fourth-quarter.html' title='Looking Back at the Fourth Quarter'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-6174681631826254324</id><published>2012-01-27T01:38:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-27T01:38:00.121-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Like Night and Day</title><content type='html'>Most of the buying and selling of stocks takes place over the course of Wall Street's trading day, but there are also purchases that occur outside of normal business hours. The Bespoke Investment Group has been looking at the difference in the markets between after-hours trades and the normal trading day, and found something fascinating has been going on.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bespoke looked at the price moves for the SPY ETF, which tracks the S&amp;amp;P 500. Over the past 50 days, they found, SPY has gained about 6 percent. But during regular trading hours, that same ETF has declined, at an average loss of 0.06 percent per day. It's only in after-hours trading that the issue has gained, with an average increase of 0.20 percent per day.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That's a pretty dramatic shift. Is there any significance to it? The folks at Bespoke don't attach any greater meaning to it, so it may simply be an instance of the markets working in mysterious ways.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-6174681631826254324?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/6174681631826254324/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/like-night-and-day.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/6174681631826254324'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/6174681631826254324'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/like-night-and-day.html' title='Like Night and Day'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-8013839946706273231</id><published>2012-01-26T01:31:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-26T01:31:00.338-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Big Apple</title><content type='html'>Apple is one of the two largest American corporations by market capitalization - depending on the day, it either leads or trails ExxonMobil-  but even that momentous fact may understate its impact on our economy. As you probably know, on Tuesday the electronics behemoth announced record-breaking profits for the fourth quarter of 2011: Its more than $13 billion in net earnings was not only the largest ever for Apple, but the second-largest ever by any American corporation. (Exxon reported a larger quarterly profit back in 2008.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That growth was enough to catapult the earnings for the entire S&amp;amp;P 500 into the black. Prior to Apple's earnings report, earnings for the S&amp;amp;P 500 as a whole were down 4.2 percent in the fourth quarter. But after Apple's report, the net for the entire S&amp;amp;P 500 is now up 4.4 percent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Apple not only doubled its profits from the year earlier, it beat the analysts' estimates by a whopping $7 billion, which is also a record. For all that, Apple's share price rose 6 percent in trading yesterday, reaching a record high of $454.45.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-8013839946706273231?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/8013839946706273231/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/big-apple.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8013839946706273231'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8013839946706273231'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/big-apple.html' title='Big Apple'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-5131882466853447127</id><published>2012-01-25T01:36:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-25T01:36:00.120-08:00</updated><title type='text'>An Aging America</title><content type='html'>The good news is that we're all living longer. If you're age 65 and healthy today, you've got a 40 percent chance of making it into your 90s. One result of this is that we're about to see a population full of older folks: According to a study from the Aite Group, by 2050, there will be 88.5 million Americans aged 65 or older. By contrast, in 2000, there were only 35 million senior citizens.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The downside of all that is that we're all going to need a lot more health care. Today's 65-year-old married couple will need $230,000 to pay for medical expenses throughout retirement, not including nursing home care. Six in ten men and eight in ten women will end up needing chronic care.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There's no doubt about it: getting older is never easy. The tradeoff we make for those extra years is the extra medical costs associated with them. If you're concerned about how you're going to pay for all those additional costs over your retirement years, feel free to give me a call.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-5131882466853447127?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/5131882466853447127/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/aging-america.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/5131882466853447127'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/5131882466853447127'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/aging-america.html' title='An Aging America'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-7156233157124144863</id><published>2012-01-24T01:15:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-24T01:15:00.822-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Forecasting the Fed</title><content type='html'>The Federal Reserve's new policy of projecting when it will raise interest rates, which we &lt;a href="http://www.echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/fed-predicts-its-own-moves.html"&gt;discussed here a few weeks ago&lt;/a&gt;, gets its first trial tomorrow. At the close of the Fed's two-day policy meeting, they are scheduled to release a forecast for when it will raise the benchmark Fed Funds rate, which has been near zero for a couple of years now.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In somewhat of an attempt to steal the Fed's thunder, Reuters released the results of a poll of Wall Street economists on when they expect interest rates to rise. The consensus answer was that we should see an increase sometime in the first half of 2014. That's a pretty safe prediction, considering the Fed has already said it will keep interest rates right where they are until at least the middle 0f 2013.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What will be interesting will be to see if the Fed's forecast matches that of the Wall Streeters. And if they differ, whose prediction will turn out to be more accurate? We won't know that answer for a long time, but there's not much reason to think that the Fed will anticipate economic conditions any better than the top economists on the Street.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-7156233157124144863?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/7156233157124144863/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/forecasting-fed.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7156233157124144863'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7156233157124144863'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/forecasting-fed.html' title='Forecasting the Fed'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-3535117498848642431</id><published>2012-01-23T01:45:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-23T01:45:01.029-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Effects of the European Downgrade</title><content type='html'>One piece of seemingly significant recent economic news was the report from Standard &amp;amp; Poor's downgrading the debt of France, Austria, Italy and Spain, as well as five smaller European nations, in response to the much-chronicled fiscal woes Europe is facing. Italy and Spain actually had their credit rating docked two notches, which should theoretically mean that they have to pay more interest to get investors to buy their debt. But since the day of the downgrade, the yield on 10-year Italian bonds has dropped from 6.64 percent to 6.34 percent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The same thing happened when S&amp;amp;P downgraded the United States' creditworthiness last August. At the time, the U.S. was paying 2.56 percent interest on its 10-year Treasury bonds; since then, it's dropped to around 2 percent. In the same time frame, the S&amp;amp;P 500 stock index has gained 9 percent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This isn't a new phenomenon. Back in 1998, Japan was downgraded by Moody's, and Japanese stocks gained 26 percent over the following year. Canada was downgraded in 1992, and Canadian stocks then gained 30 percent over the following year. That doesn't mean credit downgrades are meaningless, but it does suggest that you shouldn't necessarily expect to see their effects in the markets.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-3535117498848642431?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/3535117498848642431/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/effects-of-european-downgrade.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/3535117498848642431'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/3535117498848642431'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/effects-of-european-downgrade.html' title='Effects of the European Downgrade'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-3412580569468165179</id><published>2012-01-20T02:16:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-20T02:16:00.293-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Unemployment: Turning a Corner?</title><content type='html'>The unemployment report that is most commonly tracked is the monthly jobs figure put out by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. But there's also a weekly report of new unemployment claims, issued by the Labor Department. It's more susceptible to statistical hiccups than the monthly report, which is why it's commonly expressed as a four-week rolling average.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But there might be something important happening with this week's figure, which shows the number of initial unemployment claims at 352,000. That's the lowest that number has been since April 2008, and represented a drop of 50,000 from the previous week's figure. The picture's even brighter here in New Jersey, where new filers for unemployment fell by 4,667, the fourth-largest drop of any state.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's too soon to tell whether that trend will continue, or even if the number of new claims will stay that low next week. But it's worth noting that last week's drop also caused the four-week moving average to fall to its second-lowest point in the past three years.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-3412580569468165179?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/3412580569468165179/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/unemployment-turning-corner.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/3412580569468165179'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/3412580569468165179'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/unemployment-turning-corner.html' title='Unemployment: Turning a Corner?'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-6210521349719943535</id><published>2012-01-19T01:24:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-19T01:24:00.801-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Mystery of Low Volume</title><content type='html'>Things have been looking pretty good for the economy lately: Unemployment is drifting downward, consumer confidence is up, and even the beleaguered banking industry has finally seen an upturn in loan demand. The market has responded as well, with the S&amp;amp;P 500 being up about 4 percent already on the year after a flat 2011.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So why, then, has trading volume on the stock markets been so low? According to research from Raymond James Equity Research, trading so far in January is down 18 percent from the same period last year. In fact, in the past four years, the only month with a lower average daily volume than this January was December 2011. Trading this month is up 5 percent from the rate in December.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Normally, January is a strong trading month. Average daily volume jumped 21 percent last January, and 23 percent in January of 2010. That makes it even stranger that there should be so little volume now.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-6210521349719943535?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/6210521349719943535/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/mystery-of-low-volume.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/6210521349719943535'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/6210521349719943535'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/mystery-of-low-volume.html' title='The Mystery of Low Volume'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-8924580887751153681</id><published>2012-01-18T01:45:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-18T01:45:01.528-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Giving Is Going Up</title><content type='html'>Here's another sign of an improving economy: The nation's wealthiest citizens are able to be more generous these days. According to a survey conducted by PNC Wealth Management, 24 percent of all investors with assets greater than a million dollars donated between $25,000 and $999,000 to charitable causes in 2010. As recently as 2008, the figure was just half that, at 12 percent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Moreover, the trend looks like it's still going up. Some 21 percent of the millionaires surveyed say they plan to increase their giving this year. And only 11 percent say they're concerned about their ability to make those contributions; almost twice as many respondents had said the same thing back in the 2008 survey.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Although their ability to give might have changed, one thing that hasn't changed is the fact that the wealthiest feel obligated to give back to their communities. Almost three fifths of the millionaires surveyed said they felt that obligation, a number that has not changed since 2008 - when the economy was in full meltdown.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-8924580887751153681?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/8924580887751153681/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/giving-is-going-up.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8924580887751153681'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8924580887751153681'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/giving-is-going-up.html' title='Giving Is Going Up'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-8062131183606149856</id><published>2012-01-17T02:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-17T02:00:05.613-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Final Year of the Current Estate Tax</title><content type='html'>&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;  &lt;w:worddocument&gt;   &lt;w:view&gt;Normal&lt;/w:View&gt;   &lt;w:zoom&gt;0&lt;/w:Zoom&gt;   &lt;w:punctuationkerning/&gt;   &lt;w:validateagainstschemas/&gt;   &lt;w:saveifxmlinvalid&gt;false&lt;/w:SaveIfXMLInvalid&gt;   &lt;w:ignoremixedcontent&gt;false&lt;/w:IgnoreMixedContent&gt;   &lt;w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext&gt;false&lt;/w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText&gt;   &lt;w:compatibility&gt;    &lt;w:breakwrappedtables/&gt;    &lt;w:snaptogridincell/&gt;    &lt;w:wraptextwithpunct/&gt;    &lt;w:useasianbreakrules/&gt;    &lt;w:dontgrowautofit/&gt;   &lt;/w:Compatibility&gt;   &lt;w:browserlevel&gt;MicrosoftInternetExplorer4&lt;/w:BrowserLevel&gt;  &lt;/w:WordDocument&gt; &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;  &lt;w:latentstyles deflockedstate="false" latentstylecount="156"&gt;  &lt;/w:LatentStyles&gt; &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 10]&gt; &lt;style&gt;  /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable  {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";  mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;  mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;  mso-style-noshow:yes;  mso-style-parent:"";  mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;  mso-para-margin:0in;  mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;  mso-pagination:widow-orphan;  font-size:10.0pt;  font-family:"Times New Roman";  mso-ansi-language:#0400;  mso-fareast-language:#0400;  mso-bidi-language:#0400;} &lt;/style&gt; &lt;![endif]--&gt;  &lt;p style="font-family: georgia;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;As we move into, this marks the second and potentially final year that the estate tax exemption &lt;span style=""&gt;&lt;/span&gt;applies only to estates worth more than $5 million, or $10 million for couples, with a tax rate of 35 percent. Since that was a hefty increase from the old exemption of $1 million, or $2 million for couples, many people have put aside their concerns about estate tax issues for the moment. After all, $10 million seems out of reach for most people.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p style="font-family: georgia;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;Tax avoidance has long been the primary reason people set up estate plans. After ranking as the Number One reason clients sought out estate planning in 2010, the tax issue dropped to Number Four last year in a survey by WealthCounsel LLC.  But the current estate law expires at the end of the year, and tax avoidance could return as a major issue shortly thereafter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: georgia;"&gt;Of course, there are many reasons to set up an estate plan – properly taking care of your family properly, leaving a charitable legacy, ensuring that your assets go as far as possible, etc. But concern about the estate tax has not disappeared. Remember, once the current law expires, there’s no telling where it could go after that. If you have any concerns about bumping up against that estate tax in the future, feel free to give me a call. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-8062131183606149856?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/8062131183606149856/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/final-year-of-current-estate-tax.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8062131183606149856'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8062131183606149856'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/final-year-of-current-estate-tax.html' title='The Final Year of the Current Estate Tax'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-385349462320556165</id><published>2012-01-16T03:16:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-16T03:16:00.909-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Playing the Earnings Game</title><content type='html'>&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;  &lt;w:worddocument&gt;   &lt;w:view&gt;Normal&lt;/w:View&gt;   &lt;w:zoom&gt;0&lt;/w:Zoom&gt;   &lt;w:punctuationkerning/&gt;   &lt;w:validateagainstschemas/&gt;   &lt;w:saveifxmlinvalid&gt;false&lt;/w:SaveIfXMLInvalid&gt;   &lt;w:ignoremixedcontent&gt;false&lt;/w:IgnoreMixedContent&gt;   &lt;w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext&gt;false&lt;/w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText&gt;   &lt;w:compatibility&gt;    &lt;w:breakwrappedtables/&gt;    &lt;w:snaptogridincell/&gt;    &lt;w:wraptextwithpunct/&gt;    &lt;w:useasianbreakrules/&gt;    &lt;w:dontgrowautofit/&gt;   &lt;/w:Compatibility&gt;   &lt;w:browserlevel&gt;MicrosoftInternetExplorer4&lt;/w:BrowserLevel&gt;  &lt;/w:WordDocument&gt; &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;  &lt;w:latentstyles deflockedstate="false" latentstylecount="156"&gt;  &lt;/w:LatentStyles&gt; &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 10]&gt; &lt;style&gt;  /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable  {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";  mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;  mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;  mso-style-noshow:yes;  mso-style-parent:"";  mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;  mso-para-margin:0in;  mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;  mso-pagination:widow-orphan;  font-size:10.0pt;  font-family:"Times New Roman";  mso-ansi-language:#0400;  mso-fareast-language:#0400;  mso-bidi-language:#0400;} &lt;/style&gt; &lt;![endif]--&gt;  &lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;As we enter the earnings reporting season for the fourth quarter of 2011, it's useful to recall that American companies have become somewhat famous for trying to lower expectations about their earnings. The Web site Thestreet.com has looked at all the companies that offered such guidance in the weeks leading up to earnings season, and found that the ratio of negative-to-positive news averaged 2.3 to 1. More than twice as many companies try to damp down expectations before reporting earnings than those who present good news.&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;For the current earnings period, companies are acting even more pessimistic than the historical norm. According to the institutional broker-dealer Strategas Research Partners, negative pre-announcements for the just-concluded fourth quarter are outnumbering positive ones by a whopping 3-to-1 margin.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;If that sounds like bad news, it’s not. That skewed ratio makes it likely that a higher percentage of stocks will beat expectations, which usually gets a stock an earnings bump in the market. As Strategas wrote in its report on the current quarter, “The ratio of negative-to positive earnings preannouncements has been a reliable contrarian indicator of market performance during earnings season throughout the years.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-385349462320556165?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/385349462320556165/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/playing-earnings-game.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/385349462320556165'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/385349462320556165'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/playing-earnings-game.html' title='Playing the Earnings Game'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-6165212383361014750</id><published>2012-01-13T02:51:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-13T02:51:00.310-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Foreclosures Down, but for How Long?</title><content type='html'>Some good news for New Jersey's beleaguered housing market: Foreclosures went way down in 2011, dropping by about 73 percent in the state. That far outpaces the national average, which fell by only 34 percent. Overall, there were 1.89 million properties involved in foreclosure proceedings throughout the country in 2011.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That trend may not last, though. According to the the research firm RealtyTrac, the biggest reason for the slowdown is that many banks have stopped foreclosure proceedings after the robo-signing scandal erupted. They figure that repossessions will go back up by about 25 percent in 2012, and expect to see about 400,000 more foreclosures nationwide.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We have another wrinkle here in New Jersey as well: The state supreme court is hearing a case where a foreclosure has been challenged because the foreclosing lender did not identify itself. That would be a violation of the Fair Foreclosure Act. The expectation is that once the court makes a decision in that case, foreclosures will start to rise here again.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-6165212383361014750?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/6165212383361014750/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/foreclosures-down-but-for-how-long.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/6165212383361014750'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/6165212383361014750'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/foreclosures-down-but-for-how-long.html' title='Foreclosures Down, but for How Long?'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-3302339628422115320</id><published>2012-01-12T02:30:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-12T02:30:00.703-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Germany Stalls</title><content type='html'>There was some slightly sobering news out of Germany yesterday, when the German government announced that the nation's economy had shrunk slightly in the fourth quarter of 2011, with a loss to GDP of 0.25 percent. Moreover, Germany's finance minister said he expected the economy to contract in the first quarter of 2012 as well. That would technically put Germany into recession, which is defined as two consecutive quarters of contracting GDP.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since Germany is the financially healthiest of the members of the European Union, it's a little scary to think that it might be sliding into recession. With an economy strongly dependent on exports to its European trading partners, Germany is hobbled by the reduced purchasing power of struggling countries like Greece, Spain and Italy. The fear of course, is that the reduction in economic activity will eventually spread over here to the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the same time, though, it's easy to overstate the German economic woes. The loss in GDP last quarter was very small, and the German government also announced that the nation's economy had grown by 3.0 percent in all of 2011. By contrast, the growth in America's GDP last year - scheduled to be announced on January 29  - is expected to be about one percentage point below that.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-3302339628422115320?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/3302339628422115320/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/germany-stalls.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/3302339628422115320'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/3302339628422115320'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/germany-stalls.html' title='Germany Stalls'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-2942156366710035359</id><published>2012-01-11T01:22:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-11T01:22:00.789-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Consumers Start to Borrow Again</title><content type='html'>Here's a sign that people are no longer living in fear of this economy: In figures released this week, we learned that consumer borrowing surged upward in November, reaching its highest level since September 2009. The increase in borrowing over the course of a single month was the largest since November 2001, exactly ten years earlier.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Revolving debt, which is primarily credit-card borrowing, climbed by $5.6 billion in the month. That was the single biggest jump in that figure since March 2008. But non-revolving debt - loans for cars, student loans, etc. - made an even bigger leap. That figure jumped by $14.8 billion, the most it's gone up in a single month since February 2005.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One of the leading factors in all that increased borrowing is car loans. Car sales in November were at their highest rate since August 2009. Overall, in 2011, the American car industry had its best year since 2008.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-2942156366710035359?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/2942156366710035359/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/consumers-start-to-borrow-again.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/2942156366710035359'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/2942156366710035359'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/consumers-start-to-borrow-again.html' title='Consumers Start to Borrow Again'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-2039051677211819377</id><published>2012-01-10T02:55:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-10T02:55:00.095-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Investors Flee Stock Funds</title><content type='html'>Yesterday we discussed the way U.S. equity mutual funds surged in the fourth quarter of 2011, rising more than 10 percent. But that wasn't enough to bring investors back into the fold. Apparently spooked by the wave of losses we endured in the third quarter, investors pulled nearly $66 billion out of domestic stock funds in the fourth quarter last year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That wasn't the only category to lose assets on the quarter. International stock funds, which gained a less-robust 4.3 percent for the fourth quarter on the way to an overall loss of 13.4 percent on the year, saw an outflow of $15.6 billion over the same time period.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Where was all that money going? Bond funds. Fixed-income funds took in $52.5 billion in new cash over the final three months of 2011. That breaks down as $41.2 billion into taxable-bond funds, and $11.3 billion into municipal-bond funds.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-2039051677211819377?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/2039051677211819377/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/investors-flee-stock-funds.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/2039051677211819377'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/2039051677211819377'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/investors-flee-stock-funds.html' title='Investors Flee Stock Funds'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-4505021014576194119</id><published>2012-01-09T01:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-09T01:00:02.588-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Mutual Fund Scorecard</title><content type='html'>The investing year of 2011 saw a huge surge in the fourth quarter, one that was necessary to get us back to even on the year. That was certainly true in the mutual fund universe, as we're seeing with the flood of year-end numbers that are now coming in. The largest mutual fund category, domestic general stocks, saw a surge of 10.8 percent in the fourth quarter, which was only enough to get it back to a loss of 1.7 percent on the year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What's remarkable is how consistent that pattern was across so many mutual fund sectors:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;* Industrials gained 14.0 percent in the fourth quarter, but still lost 4.1 percent on the year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;* Energy stocks gained 13.2 percent in the fourth quarter, but still lost 4.6 percent on the year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;* Natural resources gained 12.7 percent in the fourth quarter, but still lost a whopping 14.5 percent on the year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A couple of areas did buck the trend. Utilities gained 8.8 percent in the fourth quarter, which actually underperformed their yearlong return of 10.8 percent. Precious-metals stocks, on the other hand, lost ground in the fourth quarter to the tune of 6.1 percent, contributing to an overall 2011 loss of 20.6 percent.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-4505021014576194119?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/4505021014576194119/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/mutual-fund-scorecard.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/4505021014576194119'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/4505021014576194119'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/mutual-fund-scorecard.html' title='The Mutual Fund Scorecard'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-4371285747725201911</id><published>2012-01-06T05:32:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-06T05:50:05.733-08:00</updated><title type='text'>A Strong December Jobs Report</title><content type='html'>The unemployment situation took another step forward this morning, with the release of the news that the economy added 200,000 jobs in the month of December.  Overall, the unemployment rate ticked down from 8.6 percent to 8.5 percent, the lowest that figure has been since February 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The private-sector news continues to be strong. In December, private-sector employment increased by 212,000 jobs, meaning that private businesses added a total of 1.9 million jobs over the course of 2011. Public-sector employment dropped by 12,000 jobs in December, and by 280,000 jobs in 2011.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One of the biggest gainers among industry sectors is what the government calls the "couriers and messengers" industry, which added 42,000 jobs in December. Other strong areas in December include retail (up 28,000), food service and drinking places (up 24,000), and health care (up 23,000).&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-4371285747725201911?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/4371285747725201911/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/strong-december-jobs-report.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/4371285747725201911'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/4371285747725201911'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/strong-december-jobs-report.html' title='A Strong December Jobs Report'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-4862823215920485372</id><published>2012-01-05T02:52:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-05T02:52:00.986-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Investing Fraud in Social Media</title><content type='html'>Social media has become a huge part of all our lives in recent years, so it stands to reason that we'd eventually see it put to use in investing fraud. An investment adviser named Anthony Fields, based in suburban Chicago, recently started going to LinkedIn discussion groups and began promoting "bank guarantees" and "medium-term notes," which eventually caught the notice of the SEC.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No one was foolish enough to fall for Fields' schemes, but the SEC has charged him with offering to sell more than $500 million in securities via various social media sites. According to the SEC, Fields also had no books or records to back up his deals, and held himself out as a broker-dealer when he was no such thing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The SEC has also said that they've detected more such fraud cases involving social media, that this might just be the tip of the iceberg. It should go without saying that your financial future is not something that should be decided on a whim, as a result of something you came across on the Internet. It's fortunate that no one fell for Fields' LinkedIn spiel; let's hope that investors are too savvy to ever do so.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-4862823215920485372?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/4862823215920485372/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/investing-fraud-in-social-media.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/4862823215920485372'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/4862823215920485372'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/investing-fraud-in-social-media.html' title='Investing Fraud in Social Media'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-9114427861152616064</id><published>2012-01-04T01:42:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-04T01:42:00.162-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Fed Predicts Its Own Moves</title><content type='html'>The Federal Reserve, as part of its bid for greater transparency, has announced that after its next Open Market Committee meeting, to be held later this month, the governors will released their predictions for when the Federal Funds rate will be raised. The benchmark Fed lending rate, you'll probably recall, has been at near-zero levels since December 2008. But the Fed is promising to reveal not just their forecast for when that rate will finally be increased, but where Fed governors see it going over the next several years, on a quarterly basis.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Will that matter? The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Wall Street Journal&lt;/span&gt; contends that if businesses know when interest rates are likely to rise, it provides greater incentives for them to make investments now, before money becomes more expensive. And the Fed could be giving the bond market a blueprint by which it could set future yield curves.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the near term, though, the whole issue might not make much difference. The Fed has already signaled that it won't raise the Fed Funds rate until at least mid-2013. And the &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Journal &lt;/span&gt;points out that there's a Fed Funds market that doesn't see any increase in the rate until at least 2014.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-9114427861152616064?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/9114427861152616064/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/fed-predicts-its-own-moves.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/9114427861152616064'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/9114427861152616064'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/fed-predicts-its-own-moves.html' title='The Fed Predicts Its Own Moves'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-7134385361094418631</id><published>2012-01-03T02:31:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-03T02:31:00.825-08:00</updated><title type='text'>What's a Prediction Worth?</title><content type='html'>With the markets opening for brand-new 2012 business today, it's time to stop looking back at 2011 and to begin looking forward to the coming year. Reuters polled 40 economists and found that the consensus predicted gain for the S&amp;amp;P 500 was just under 7 percent for 2011. A similar poll conducted by Bloomberg found an average predicted gain of 7.2 percent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That would, of course, be a substantial improvement over last year, which as we've seen, was virtually flat. But it's also the smallest predicted gain from these surveys since 2005. Every year since then, economists have expected 7 percent rise in the markets or better - and of course, they've often been very, very wrong.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For example, the Bloomberg survey last year forecast a gain in the S&amp;amp;P of just over 8 percent.  To be fair, that was the biggest miss by the Bloomberg survey since 2008, when it had its worst year ever, predicting a 7 percent gain in a year when the index ended up with a loss of 38 percent.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-7134385361094418631?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/7134385361094418631/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/whats-prediction-worth.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7134385361094418631'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7134385361094418631'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/whats-prediction-worth.html' title='What&apos;s a Prediction Worth?'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-8917432990387230382</id><published>2012-01-02T04:36:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-02T04:36:00.527-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The S&amp;P Goes Nowhere</title><content type='html'>After all was said and done, the S&amp;amp;P 500 lost ground for the 2011 calendar year, after losing 0.43 percent of its value on Friday, the final trading day of 2011. In the end, the index lost a vanishingly small 0.04 percent on the year, the smallest change - in either direction - since 1947.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;How minuscule was the change? The index closed on December 31, 2010, at 1257.64. Last Friday, December 30, 2011, the S&amp;amp;P closed at 1257.60. That's a total drop on the year of 0.04 points.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That's close enough to call it unchanged over the course of the year. The Nasdaq registered a slightly more noticeable loss for 2011, finishing down 1.8 percent. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, made up of 30 of the biggest stocks in the nation, finished the year up 5.5 percent.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-8917432990387230382?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/8917432990387230382/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/s-goes-nowhere.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8917432990387230382'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8917432990387230382'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2012/01/s-goes-nowhere.html' title='The S&amp;P Goes Nowhere'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-3995021876779499216</id><published>2011-12-30T02:37:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-30T02:37:01.099-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Ending on a High Note?</title><content type='html'>&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;  &lt;w:worddocument&gt;   &lt;w:view&gt;Normal&lt;/w:View&gt;   &lt;w:zoom&gt;0&lt;/w:Zoom&gt;   &lt;w:punctuationkerning/&gt;   &lt;w:validateagainstschemas/&gt;   &lt;w:saveifxmlinvalid&gt;false&lt;/w:SaveIfXMLInvalid&gt;   &lt;w:ignoremixedcontent&gt;false&lt;/w:IgnoreMixedContent&gt;   &lt;w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext&gt;false&lt;/w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText&gt;   &lt;w:compatibility&gt;    &lt;w:breakwrappedtables/&gt;    &lt;w:snaptogridincell/&gt;    &lt;w:wraptextwithpunct/&gt;    &lt;w:useasianbreakrules/&gt;    &lt;w:dontgrowautofit/&gt;   &lt;/w:Compatibility&gt;   &lt;w:browserlevel&gt;MicrosoftInternetExplorer4&lt;/w:BrowserLevel&gt;  &lt;/w:WordDocument&gt; &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;  &lt;w:latentstyles deflockedstate="false" latentstylecount="156"&gt;  &lt;/w:LatentStyles&gt; &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if !mso]&gt;&lt;object classid="clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D" id="ieooui"&gt;&lt;/object&gt; &lt;style&gt; st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } &lt;/style&gt; &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 10]&gt; &lt;style&gt;  /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable  {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";  mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;  mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;  mso-style-noshow:yes;  mso-style-parent:"";  mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;  mso-para-margin:0in;  mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;  mso-pagination:widow-orphan;  font-size:10.0pt;  font-family:"Times New Roman";  mso-ansi-language:#0400;  mso-fareast-language:#0400;  mso-bidi-language:#0400;} &lt;/style&gt; &lt;![endif]--&gt;  &lt;p&gt;How about some good economic news to finish the year? Although new U.S. jobless claims came in at 381,000, up from 366,000 the prior week, the four-week moving average fell to 375,000 last week. That means that fewer Americans filed for jobless benefits during the past month than at any time in the past three years.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Even the beleaguered housing industry had some good news: Pending home sales rose 7.3 percent in November, which puts them at their highest level in 19 months. The National Association of Realtors said its pending sales index is now up to 100.1 in November, where 100 signifies the market as it existed in 2001. &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;All this helped the S&amp;amp;P 500&lt;a href="http://topics.bloomberg.com/s%26p-500/"&gt;&lt;span style="color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; climb 1.1 percent on Thursday, leaving it up 0.4 percent for the year. The S&amp;amp;P closed 2010 at 1258, and opens today at 1263 – adding a grand total of five points over the course of the year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-3995021876779499216?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/3995021876779499216/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/ending-on-high-note.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/3995021876779499216'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/3995021876779499216'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/ending-on-high-note.html' title='Ending on a High Note?'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-4154184018141149951</id><published>2011-12-29T03:20:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-29T03:20:00.742-08:00</updated><title type='text'>A Late Surge in Christmas Shopping</title><content type='html'>The Christmas shopping season turned out to have been a pretty strong one, in large part because of a surge toward the end - and even after Christmas was over. According to the market-research firm ShopperTrak, Christmas Eve was the second-biggest shopping day of the season, following only Black Friday. And the third-largest was a big surprise: the day after Christmas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The calendar obviously played a large part in this. With Christmas on a Sunday, everyone had Christmas Eve off to do last-minute shopping. And the day after Christmas became a federal holiday, freeing people up to spend even more. With many stores offering huge post-Christmas discounts, we got results like that of Brooks Brothers, which had a record sales day at its stores and Web site on December 26, when the clothier had discounts of up to 40 percent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That final push could make a huge difference in retailers meeting their goals for the year. Preliminary estimates show that retail revenue for the week ended on Christmas Eve was up 14.8 percent over 2010.  We should see full retail figures for the holiday season sometime next week.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-4154184018141149951?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/4154184018141149951/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/late-surge-in-christmas-shopping.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/4154184018141149951'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/4154184018141149951'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/late-surge-in-christmas-shopping.html' title='A Late Surge in Christmas Shopping'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-8057722374871624987</id><published>2011-12-28T02:46:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-28T02:46:00.249-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Still Waters Run Deep</title><content type='html'>&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;  &lt;w:worddocument&gt;   &lt;w:view&gt;Normal&lt;/w:View&gt;   &lt;w:zoom&gt;0&lt;/w:Zoom&gt;   &lt;w:punctuationkerning/&gt;   &lt;w:validateagainstschemas/&gt;   &lt;w:saveifxmlinvalid&gt;false&lt;/w:SaveIfXMLInvalid&gt;   &lt;w:ignoremixedcontent&gt;false&lt;/w:IgnoreMixedContent&gt;   &lt;w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext&gt;false&lt;/w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText&gt;   &lt;w:compatibility&gt;    &lt;w:breakwrappedtables/&gt;    &lt;w:snaptogridincell/&gt;    &lt;w:wraptextwithpunct/&gt;    &lt;w:useasianbreakrules/&gt;    &lt;w:dontgrowautofit/&gt;   &lt;/w:Compatibility&gt;   &lt;w:browserlevel&gt;MicrosoftInternetExplorer4&lt;/w:BrowserLevel&gt;  &lt;/w:WordDocument&gt; &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;  &lt;w:latentstyles deflockedstate="false" latentstylecount="156"&gt;  &lt;/w:LatentStyles&gt; &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 10]&gt; &lt;style&gt;  /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable  {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";  mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;  mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;  mso-style-noshow:yes;  mso-style-parent:"";  mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;  mso-para-margin:0in;  mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;  mso-pagination:widow-orphan;  font-size:10.0pt;  font-family:"Times New Roman";  mso-ansi-language:#0400;  mso-fareast-language:#0400;  mso-bidi-language:#0400;} &lt;/style&gt; &lt;![endif]--&gt;  &lt;p&gt;As we said yesterday, this has been overall a very quiet year for the S&amp;amp;P 500. At this point, it’s up 0.6 percent on the year, which would be the smallest move for the index in either direction since 1970. But that doesn’t mean it has been a quiet year. By the end of April, the S&amp;amp;P had risen 8.4 percent and almost reached a three-year high. But between then and October 3, the index fell by 19 percent, before rebounding to close the year.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;August, normally a sleepy time of the year for the markets, was the most volatile month we saw. During that month, the daily change in the S&amp;amp;P 500 averaged 2.2 percent, the highest it’s been for any August since 1932. During one four-day stretch in August, the Dow Jones average alternated gains and losses of 400 points, for the first time ever.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;The year also brought big swings to the individual companies on the S&amp;amp;P 500. Eighty-five of its listed stocks fell by 20 percent or more, compared with just 11 in 2010 and 15 in 2009. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-8057722374871624987?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/8057722374871624987/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/still-waters-run-deep.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8057722374871624987'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8057722374871624987'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/still-waters-run-deep.html' title='Still Waters Run Deep'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-8383663207759875722</id><published>2011-12-27T02:42:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-27T02:42:00.481-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Finishing 2011</title><content type='html'>This final week of 2011 promises to be a relatively quiet one for the markets. Many of the traders are on vacation this week, and there are only four trading days to being with, so we shouldn't expect to see a lot of movement either way.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the other hand, though, this could be a make-or-break week for the major indexes. This past year has been characterized by a lot of volatility that has brought us more or less right back to where we started the year. At the end of last week, the S&amp;amp;P 500 inched back into positive territory for 2011, putting it at a minuscule 0.6 percent gain for the year. So even the smallest decline could put the S&amp;amp;P back under the break-even point.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Nasdaq is in a somewhat different position - at the moment, it's down 1.3 percent on the year. A small rally could push it into positive territory for the year. The Dow Jones average, though, looks like it will safely finish the year up: it's gained 6.1 percent so far for 2011.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-8383663207759875722?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/8383663207759875722/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/finishing-2011.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8383663207759875722'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8383663207759875722'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/finishing-2011.html' title='Finishing 2011'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-2515891780991185904</id><published>2011-12-26T01:16:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-26T01:16:00.176-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Gen Y and Retirement</title><content type='html'>A survey from ING that came out last week showed that 71 percent of Americans do not have any sort of formal retirement plan. While that number is a little scary, it does not mean that people in the U.S. aren't saving for retirement: the same survey showed that fully 75 percent of Americans  between the ages of 25 and 69 who have a job are putting money away into a retirement savings account.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One cohort that is doing a surprisingly good job of saving for retirement is younger people, the so-called Generation Y. Among Americans born between 1977 and 1989, 25 percent say they funded both a 401(k) and an IRA in 2010, according to a survey by TD Ameritrade. That's a higher percentage than Generation Xers (born between 1965 and 1976) or Baby Boomers, who checked in at 23 percent and 16 percent, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The key, as always, is knowing what you're doing. Only 28 percent of those in the ING survey said they were working with a financial professional; 47 percent expected their employer to give them all the guidance they needed. With something as important as reitrement, though, you can't wait around for help - you've got to be proactive.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-2515891780991185904?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/2515891780991185904/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/gen-y-and-retirement.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/2515891780991185904'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/2515891780991185904'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/gen-y-and-retirement.html' title='Gen Y and Retirement'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-7998647301244015805</id><published>2011-12-23T03:46:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-23T03:46:00.523-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Happy Holidays</title><content type='html'>&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;  &lt;w:worddocument&gt;   &lt;w:view&gt;Normal&lt;/w:View&gt;   &lt;w:zoom&gt;0&lt;/w:Zoom&gt;   &lt;w:punctuationkerning/&gt;   &lt;w:validateagainstschemas/&gt;   &lt;w:saveifxmlinvalid&gt;false&lt;/w:SaveIfXMLInvalid&gt;   &lt;w:ignoremixedcontent&gt;false&lt;/w:IgnoreMixedContent&gt;   &lt;w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext&gt;false&lt;/w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText&gt;   &lt;w:compatibility&gt;    &lt;w:breakwrappedtables/&gt;    &lt;w:snaptogridincell/&gt;    &lt;w:wraptextwithpunct/&gt;    &lt;w:useasianbreakrules/&gt;    &lt;w:dontgrowautofit/&gt;   &lt;/w:Compatibility&gt;   &lt;w:browserlevel&gt;MicrosoftInternetExplorer4&lt;/w:BrowserLevel&gt;  &lt;/w:WordDocument&gt; &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;  &lt;w:latentstyles deflockedstate="false" latentstylecount="156"&gt;  &lt;/w:LatentStyles&gt; &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if !mso]&gt;&lt;object classid="clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D" id="ieooui"&gt;&lt;/object&gt; &lt;style&gt; st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } &lt;/style&gt; &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 10]&gt; &lt;style&gt;  /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable  {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";  mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;  mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;  mso-style-noshow:yes;  mso-style-parent:"";  mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;  mso-para-margin:0in;  mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;  mso-pagination:widow-orphan;  font-size:10.0pt;  font-family:"Times New Roman";  mso-ansi-language:#0400;  mso-fareast-language:#0400;  mso-bidi-language:#0400;} &lt;/style&gt; &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;  &lt;w:worddocument&gt;   &lt;w:view&gt;Normal&lt;/w:View&gt;   &lt;w:zoom&gt;0&lt;/w:Zoom&gt;   &lt;w:punctuationkerning/&gt;   &lt;w:validateagainstschemas/&gt;   &lt;w:saveifxmlinvalid&gt;false&lt;/w:SaveIfXMLInvalid&gt;   &lt;w:ignoremixedcontent&gt;false&lt;/w:IgnoreMixedContent&gt;   &lt;w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext&gt;false&lt;/w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText&gt;   &lt;w:compatibility&gt;    &lt;w:breakwrappedtables/&gt;    &lt;w:snaptogridincell/&gt;    &lt;w:wraptextwithpunct/&gt;    &lt;w:useasianbreakrules/&gt;    &lt;w:dontgrowautofit/&gt;   &lt;/w:Compatibility&gt;   &lt;w:browserlevel&gt;MicrosoftInternetExplorer4&lt;/w:BrowserLevel&gt;  &lt;/w:WordDocument&gt; &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;  &lt;w:latentstyles deflockedstate="false" latentstylecount="156"&gt;  &lt;/w:LatentStyles&gt; &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if !mso]&gt;&lt;object classid="clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D" id="ieooui"&gt;&lt;/object&gt; &lt;style&gt; st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } &lt;/style&gt; &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 10]&gt; &lt;style&gt;  /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable  {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";  mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;  mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;  mso-style-noshow:yes;  mso-style-parent:"";  mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;  mso-para-margin:0in;  mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;  mso-pagination:widow-orphan;  font-size:10.0pt;  font-family:"Times New Roman";  mso-ansi-language:#0400;  mso-fareast-language:#0400;  mso-bidi-language:#0400;} &lt;/style&gt; &lt;![endif]--&gt;  &lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;We've got some good economic news to ring in the holiday season:&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt; * The biggest news is that unemployment claims fell to 364,000 last week, putting new unemployment claims at their lowest level since April 2008. The number of people continuing to receive jobless benefits fell to 3.55 million, the lowest that number has been since September 2008.&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;* The Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan index of consumer sentiment increased to 69.9 in December, up from 64.1 in November.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt;* &lt;/span&gt;One      thing helping both consumer confidence and consumer spending is that the price&lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=3AGSREG:IND" title="Get Quote"&gt;&lt;span style="color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; of regular unleaded gasoline at      the pump fell to $3.21 a gallon Dec. 20, the lowest it’s been since February.      Here in New Jersey,      we’re under the national average, at $3.09 a gallon.&lt;/p&gt;      &lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;One bit of bad news is that fact that the government has revised the third quarter GDP number down to 1.8 percent from the earlier reading of 2.0. That, though, is a backward-looking figure; the other signs are pointing to better times ahead.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-7998647301244015805?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/7998647301244015805/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/happy-holidays.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7998647301244015805'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7998647301244015805'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/happy-holidays.html' title='Happy Holidays'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-7563561594651904311</id><published>2011-12-22T01:15:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-22T01:15:00.585-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Strongest Funds of the Year</title><content type='html'>Despite all the economic problems America has faced recently, investors still believe in the long-term prospects for the United States. The latest evidence: Long-term Treasury bond funds are headed for the top spot among all mutual funds for 2011. These funds, which generally hold Treasury bonds with maturities of 20 years or more, have an average return of 32 percent on the year so far, according to Morningstar.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Among Morningstar's 86 different fund categories, the runners-up on the year are also bond funds. In second place are funds holding primarily inflation-protected U.S. Treasurys, which are up an average of 11.5 percent, followed by funds holding long-term California muni bonds, up 11.1 percent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;U.S. Treasury bonds were in great demand this year, as investors fled the European situation in search of a safe haven, and the Federal Reserve bought up $600 billion worth of them as part of its quantitative easing program. This was also the year, ironically, when Standard &amp;amp; Poor's downgraded the creditworthiness of the United States, supposedly signaling to investors that the U.S. was not so safe a haven after all. Clearly, investors have decided that S&amp;amp;P was wrong.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-7563561594651904311?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/7563561594651904311/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/strongest-funds-of-year.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7563561594651904311'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7563561594651904311'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/strongest-funds-of-year.html' title='The Strongest Funds of the Year'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-218333552789753051</id><published>2011-12-21T02:49:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-21T02:49:00.105-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Consumer Confidence: The Long View</title><content type='html'>Although we talk quite a bit about the monthly consumer confidence index put out by the Conference Board, the pollster Gallup monitors something similar, with a daily index called the Economic Confidence Index. According to Gallup, the year is ending on an upswing: the readings for the week of December 11, at -39, are the highest they've been since July.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bad news is that the current reading is still lower than it was at this time last year, when the figure was -32. The big issue that drove down Americans' economic confidence was the battle over the debt ceiling, when the entire country risked a default; that crisis raged most of the summer, and was resolved at the first of August. The Economic Confidence Index, at -34 toward the beginning of July, dropped to -54 by the end of August. It's been climbing ever since.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That's a good trend to have going into the New Year, but we're really just getting back to the post-recession norms. Before the crisis this summer, the Economic Confidence Index had been moving in a fairly narrow band between -20 and -40 since the recession ended in 2009. What we really need is for it to get back to positive territory.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-218333552789753051?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/218333552789753051/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/consumer-confidence-long-view.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/218333552789753051'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/218333552789753051'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/consumer-confidence-long-view.html' title='Consumer Confidence: The Long View'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-4102978762324941356</id><published>2011-12-20T03:37:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-20T03:37:00.230-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Holiday Travel on the Rise</title><content type='html'>Heading out of town for the holidays? If so, you're not alone: AAA projects that 2.2 million New Jerseyans will be traveling at least 50 miles between this coming Friday and January 2, up slightly from last year. Nationwide, there will be 91.9 million people traveling that far for Christmas or New Year's, up 1.4 percent over last year's total.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interestingly enough, we're seeing a shift from flying to driving for the holidays. This year, 6 percent of all holiday travelers are expected to take a plane, down 10 percent from last year. Drivers are expected to make up up 91 percent of all holiday travelers, up 0.9 percent from 2010. As a result, the average distance traveled is down significantly, from 1052 miles per trip last year to 726 miles per trip this year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;All told, more than 2 million people will be on the roads for the holidays, and around 140,000 in the air - which leaves 65,000 people using what AAA calls "another method," primarily railroads. That mode of transport is actually the biggest gainer on the year, up 3 percent from 2010.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-4102978762324941356?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/4102978762324941356/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/holiday-travel-on-rise.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/4102978762324941356'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/4102978762324941356'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/holiday-travel-on-rise.html' title='Holiday Travel on the Rise'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-7742866396523340778</id><published>2011-12-19T01:59:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-19T01:59:00.205-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Holidays Looking Happy</title><content type='html'>As the Christmas shopping season chugs into the home stretch, it looks like it will be a merry one for the economy. Four separate days during the past week totaled $1 billion in online sales, according to the research firm ComScore. Overall, online shopping is up 15 percent over the same time frame in 2010, up to a whopping $30.9 billion, with a week still to go.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The re-branding of the Monday as Cyber Monday after Thanksgiving seems to have been a success. It was the single biggest online shopping day of this Christmas season so far, with total sales of $1.25 billion. Online shopping is expected to decline as we near Christmas Day, so Cyber Monday should retain that distinction.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's too early to assess overall consumer spending for the holiday season, but the signs point to that being positive as well. With many retailers feel that their deep discounting will pay dividends, ShopperTrak is now estimating sales for November and December combined will be up 3.7 percent from the year earlier.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-7742866396523340778?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/7742866396523340778/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/holidays-looking-happy.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7742866396523340778'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7742866396523340778'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/holidays-looking-happy.html' title='Holidays Looking Happy'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-1577985054909299012</id><published>2011-12-16T01:22:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-16T01:22:01.016-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Food Stamps in Hunterdon County</title><content type='html'>You may have heard a somewhat alarming story this week, about how Hunterdon County in the western part of New Jersey, which is the richest county in our state, showed the biggest increase in food-stamp usage between 2007 and 2010 of any county in America. And it's technically true: Over those four years, the number of people using food stamps in Hunterdon County grew by more than 500 percent. &lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;But that's mostly because the numbers were growing from such a small starting point. In 2007, there were only 232 food-stamp cases in the county; now that number is over 1400. Since the population of the county is around 128,000, the number of people on food stamps in Hunterdon County is around 1.1 percent. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;This issue isn't confined to New Jersey. According to the Census Bureau, the percentage of households using food stamps has doubled in six of the nation's ten wealthiest counties. But keep in mind that these counties had a handful of people on food stamps a few years ago, meaning it was much easier to show a large percentage increase. While the trend might be a cause for concern, it's worth keeping in mind that the math behind it is a little fuzzy.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-1577985054909299012?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/1577985054909299012/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/food-stamps-in-hunterdon-county.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/1577985054909299012'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/1577985054909299012'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/food-stamps-in-hunterdon-county.html' title='Food Stamps in Hunterdon County'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-8515421189132731723</id><published>2011-12-15T01:44:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-15T01:44:01.082-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Why Are Mutual Fund Costs Dropping?</title><content type='html'>One of the great concerns of the mutual fund industry has long been the problem that the best-managed funds tend to carry heavy fund expenses along with them.  Many expensive funds have roped in investors with promises of strong returns, then continued to collect those expenses even if the performance didn't warrant it. The good news is, though, that investors have proven to be too savvy to allow this to go on for very long.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That's the conclusion of a new study from the Investment Company Institute, which has been tracking mutual fund expenses over time. The ICI found that investors regularly flee high-expense funds that don't prove to be worth the extra money, which has the effect of bringing down expenses for all funds. Back in 2003, the average expense ratio paid by fund shareholders was  0.99 percent. It fell pretty consistently throughout the decade, though,  and in 2010 was down to 0.84 percent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When funds have to compete on those costs, prices fall for everyone. That means that actively managed funds of the kind we use here at Echelon Wealth Strategies are not only competitive on price, but getting more competitive all the time.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-8515421189132731723?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/8515421189132731723/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/why-are-mutual-fund-costs-dropping.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8515421189132731723'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8515421189132731723'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/why-are-mutual-fund-costs-dropping.html' title='Why Are Mutual Fund Costs Dropping?'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-8220497352143206222</id><published>2011-12-14T03:11:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-14T03:11:00.414-08:00</updated><title type='text'>An Upsurge in Commercial Credit</title><content type='html'>The Federal Reserve decided yesterday not to take further action to try to jump-start the economy with further monetary stimulus. One reason for the lack of action - according to the Fed's Dallas governor, Robert McTeer - was the fact that bank credit has been growing recently, signaling that we could see further economic expansion in 2012. &lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Commercial and industrial loans had dropped by 1.7 percent over the past four years, but they ballooned by nearly 10 percent in the third quarter of 2011. Overall, bank credit is growing at its fastest pace in three years. McTeer thinks that could mean growth in the fourth-quarter GDP figures that then continues on that path into next year. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;The largest beneficiary of this borrowing is likely to be the small-business community. Not as likely to benefit from the trend: The housing market. While commercial loans were growing. bank real estate loans actually dropped by 2.4 percent in the third quarter. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-8220497352143206222?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/8220497352143206222/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/upsurge-in-commercial-credit.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8220497352143206222'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8220497352143206222'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/upsurge-in-commercial-credit.html' title='An Upsurge in Commercial Credit'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-8488092580380423269</id><published>2011-12-13T00:41:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-13T00:41:01.026-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Economy's Surprises</title><content type='html'>With all the signs in recent weeks that our economy has been gaining strength, it might just be the case that economists are missing the boat and underestimating our recent growth. A metric called the Citigroup Economic Surprise Index, which measures the distance between economists' expectations and the actual economic statistics,  is now at its highest level in nine months. &lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div&gt;The biggest reasons the economy has exceeded expectations recently:&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;* The unemployment rate dropped rather suddenly, to 8.6 percent, in part because of revisions to the number of jobs that were added in previous months.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;* Economists undershot the recent gains in the Institute for Supply Management's factory index, which estimates the growth of the nation's industrial output.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;* The holiday retail shopping season has been somewhat stronger than expected.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;None of this makes the economy any stronger in reality, but corporations make decisions based on economic forecasts. If the economy was able to post its recent gains based on an unduly pessimistic outlook, it may grow even more strongly once people recognize how solid things are.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-8488092580380423269?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/8488092580380423269/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/economys-surprises.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8488092580380423269'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8488092580380423269'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/economys-surprises.html' title='The Economy&apos;s Surprises'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-6594889900475663270</id><published>2011-12-12T01:28:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-12T01:28:00.724-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Food Prices Heading Down</title><content type='html'>Are we headed for a drop in food prices? The smart money sure seems to think so. There's a new report out from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission reporting that hedge funds have dropped their bullish speculative positions on agricultural commodities to their lowest level since September 2009. The Standard &amp;amp; Poor's GSCI Agricultural Index, which includes such things as wheat, soybeans and cattle, also reached a 14-month low last week.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What's the cause? It's not so much the worldwide economic turmoil as some record harvests. The planet's stockpile of wheat is expected to reach 202.58 million tons by June, which would be the highest it's been in over ten years. Corn and soybean reserves are also increasing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even cocoa, which had been in a years-long production slump, is turning around. Cocoa prices were at a 32-year high in March, thanks in large part to political unrest in Africa, where much of the world's cocoa is produced, but they've fallen off 45 percent since then. That will make your Christmas chocolate goodies taste all the sweeter.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-6594889900475663270?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/6594889900475663270/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/food-prices-heading-down.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/6594889900475663270'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/6594889900475663270'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/food-prices-heading-down.html' title='Food Prices Heading Down'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-8660800683063058706</id><published>2011-12-09T02:04:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-09T02:04:00.382-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Good News About Retirement</title><content type='html'>With all the concern we hear over people who are planning and preparing for their retirement, it's nice to learn that, once you get through all that strife, people who reach retirement are pretty darn happy to be there. More than three-quarters of all retirees say they are happier now that they've retired, according to a survey from The Hartford and the MIT AgeLab. Significantly, that figure is much higher than the 64 percent of working folks who say "I will be happier after I retire." In other words, retirement is even better than most people expect it to be.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In a similar finding, 27 percent of the retirees described themselves as feeling "peaceful." A slightly smaller percentage of pre-retirees described themselves as "hopeful" about their retirement.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The biggest regret among retirees? No one answer stood out, although the most-cited answer, named by 32 percent of the respondents, was that they wish they had been better prepared financially for their retirement. It's never too late - or too early - to get started on those preparations.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-8660800683063058706?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/8660800683063058706/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/good-news-about-retirement.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8660800683063058706'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8660800683063058706'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/good-news-about-retirement.html' title='The Good News About Retirement'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-7959755467119747650</id><published>2011-12-08T02:07:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-08T02:07:01.499-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Americans Are Borrowing Again</title><content type='html'>A couple of weeks ago, we talked about how American indebtedness had been growing as a result of increases in mortgages, despite the fact that consumer credit hadn't kept pace. But now we have news that Americans have started borrowing for consumer items as well. Consumer borrowing increased by $7.65 billion in October, reaching a total of $2.46 trillion, the highest it's been since October 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Revolving debt, which is mostly credit cards, increased by $366.2 million in October. Non-revolving debt, which includes car loans increased by $7.28 billion. The driving force behind this was car loans; auto sales just had their best month since August 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The other side of increased borrowing, of course, is that people are saving less. In the third quarter of 2011, the savings rate fell to 3.8 percent, the lowest it's been since the recession started at the end of 2007. While saving is always a good idea, given the state of our economy, the increased indebtedness might be a little more helpful right now.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-7959755467119747650?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/7959755467119747650/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/americans-are-borrowing-again.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7959755467119747650'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7959755467119747650'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/americans-are-borrowing-again.html' title='Americans Are Borrowing Again'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-3748536029601005615</id><published>2011-12-07T02:11:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-07T02:11:00.932-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Great Company, Bad Stock</title><content type='html'>A new stock issue went on the market yesterday, offering investors a chance to buy equity in a highly successful firm currently on top of all its competitors. The stock moved quickly, with 1600 shares sold in the first 11 minutes they were available, at a cost of $250 per share. The only catch: It's a terrible investment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The shares are being sold in the Green Bay Packers, who are the best team in the NFL right now with a perfect 12-0 record. The franchise is currently owned by some 112,000 stockholders who claim a total of 4.75 million shares. The new offering put another 250,000 shares on the market, with the proceeds going toward a renovation of Lambeau Field, the Packers' 54-year-old stadium in Green Bay.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Stockholders can expect no dividends or appreciation, and the shares can't be sold. They don't even get you a special place on the Packers' season ticket waiting list, which is now 93,000 names long. The sole perks that come with being a team owner are the right to attend an annual shareholders meeting and some special deals on Green Bay Packer apparel. And some very special bragging rights come Super Bowl time.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-3748536029601005615?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/3748536029601005615/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/great-company-bad-stock.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/3748536029601005615'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/3748536029601005615'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/great-company-bad-stock.html' title='Great Company, Bad Stock'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-653353562040455765</id><published>2011-12-06T03:23:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-06T03:23:00.224-08:00</updated><title type='text'>$10 Trillion in the Bank</title><content type='html'>The American banking system reached a milestone late last month: For the first time, there was more than $10 trillion in deposits at our nation's banks and savings institutions. Maybe the most interesting thing about this is that it's not normal consumer accounts, like CDs and savings accounts, that are accounting for the growth. In fact, interest-bearing deposits actually fell by 1 percent over the past year, according to the &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Wall Street Journal&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So what's the reason for all that growth? It's actually non-interest-bearing accounts of the type used by businesses to put their cash short-term. Those types of accounts increased by 30 percent over the past 12 months, reaching a total of $2 trillion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We've discussed many times the amount of cash that is sitting in the coffers of many American corporations; these are those coffers. The &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Journal&lt;/span&gt; points out that we can expect these deposits to disappear from retail banks' bottom line just as quickly as they showed up there.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-653353562040455765?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/653353562040455765/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/10-trillion-in-bank.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/653353562040455765'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/653353562040455765'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/10-trillion-in-bank.html' title='$10 Trillion in the Bank'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-5326878392035381123</id><published>2011-12-05T01:39:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-05T01:39:00.542-08:00</updated><title type='text'>2011's Biggest Winner</title><content type='html'>Of the 500 stocks listed in the Standard &amp;amp; Poor's 500, only one has doubled in share price this year: Cabot Oil &amp;amp; Gas. Cabot finished 2010 at $37.85, and entered December at $88.59, for a year-to-date increase of a whopping 134.06 percent. The Houston-based natural gas company, which has only been in the S&amp;amp;P 500 since June 2008, has been by far the biggest winner in 2011, outdistancing another Houston natural gas company, El Paso Corp., which is in second place with a year-to-date gain of 81.76 percent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Before you get too excited about Cabot, though, note that in 2010, its stock lost 13.17 percent on the year. As they say, past performance is no guarantee of future results.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No stock on the S&amp;amp;P has been nearly as bad this year as Cabot has been good. The worst performer has been Monster Worldwide, which runs the job-search Web site and has dropped by 69.06 percent. Hot on its heels is Netflix, which has lost 63.27 percent in the wake of its disastrous, now-aborted split into two separate businesses. Like Cabot Oil &amp;amp; Gas, Netflix has seen some quick turnarounds lately: In 2010, its stock had grown by more than 200 percent.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-5326878392035381123?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/5326878392035381123/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/2011s-biggest-winner.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/5326878392035381123'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/5326878392035381123'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/2011s-biggest-winner.html' title='2011&apos;s Biggest Winner'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-5411899829571863769</id><published>2011-12-02T05:23:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-02T05:56:14.135-08:00</updated><title type='text'>An Encouraging Jobs Report</title><content type='html'>The November unemployment report came out from the Bureau of Labor Statistics this morning, and it continued the trend we've been seeing for a couple of months now: Job creation for the month was relatively solid but unspectacular, at 120,000 new jobs added to the economy. But there's a difference this time. Although that's about the number of new jobs economists say we need to tread water in the employment figures, the official unemployment number dropped in November from 9.0 percent to 8.6 percent. That's the lowest unemployment has been since March 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What happened? The rate dropped in large part because the number of jobs added in October got officially revised upward, from 80,000 to 100,000, as well as the number from September, which went from 158,000 to a whopping 210,000.  That makes four straight months in which the government has ended up revising the new-jobs figure upward.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Perhaps even more encouraging, the broadest measures of unemployment are dropping as well. Adding part-time workers seeking full-time work to get to the government's U-6 figure, which includes both the unemployed and underemployed,  that number dropped in November to 15.6 percent, from 16.2 percent the previous month. All told, today's report continues a string of good economic news from the past week or so that should bring some cheer to everyone as we head into the holiday season.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-5411899829571863769?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/5411899829571863769/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/encouraging-jobs-report.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/5411899829571863769'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/5411899829571863769'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/encouraging-jobs-report.html' title='An Encouraging Jobs Report'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-556038490118803579</id><published>2011-12-01T04:44:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-01T04:44:00.221-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Central Banks Take Action</title><content type='html'>The markets had another big day yesterday - the Dow Jones average posted its biggest single-day gain since March of 2009, and European markets were up strongly as well - and the financial press rushed to give credit for the upswing to coordinated action on the part of the world's central banks. But what exactly did they do?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Two things happened: First, the Federal Reserve and the central banks of Europe, England, Canada, Japan  and Switzerland announced that they would coordinate efforts to reduce the cost for banks around the world to borrow money from their nation's central banks. The idea is to keep money flowing freely throughout Europe, and trying to sure that the banks there don't get caught short and they end up with another Lehman Brothers collapse on their hands. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the same time, China announced it was cutting the reserve requirements for its banks, after raising those requirements six times earlier this year. That should permit China's banks to lend money more freely, which is ultimately good for economies around the world. While it's always risky to read too much into one day's market moves, it does appear that investors around the world do like these developments.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-556038490118803579?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/556038490118803579/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/central-banks-take-action.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/556038490118803579'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/556038490118803579'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/12/central-banks-take-action.html' title='The Central Banks Take Action'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-739523208633131185</id><published>2011-11-30T01:30:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-11-30T01:30:01.108-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Reasons to Be Confident?</title><content type='html'>Is the economy finally turning a corner? American consumers seem to think so. The readings for the November consumer confidence index are the strongest we've seen in a long time, with the largest single-month gain since April 2003. As it generally does, Bloomberg News had surveyed economists before the release of the November figure, and not a single one of them predicted the jump would be as large as it turned out to be.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While it's dangerous to read too much into short-term prices swings, the solid early results from the Christmas shopping season combined with the strong consumer readings could be buoying some sectors of the stock market. Among the biggest gainers in the Dow yesterday were consumer bulwarks Home Depot, Wal-Mart and Coca-Cola. The S&amp;amp;P 500 posted its biggest one-day gain in over a month.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's a good sign that all this is happening even before we get to December.  December has historically been the best month for the stock market, which means that we have several indicators in place to end 2011 on a high note.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-739523208633131185?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/739523208633131185/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/reasons-to-be-confident.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/739523208633131185'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/739523208633131185'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/reasons-to-be-confident.html' title='Reasons to Be Confident?'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-7954761565660569849</id><published>2011-11-29T02:01:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-11-29T02:01:00.253-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Debt Drops, but Not Spending</title><content type='html'>Whether it's through a new sense of discipline or merely because people are still afraid of ending up broke, consumer indebtedness continues to decline in America. The Federal Reserve released a study yesterday indicating that our collective debt fell by $60 billion in the quarter ended September 30. Mortgage debt was responsible for pretty much all of that, dropping by a total of $114 billion. Consumer indebtedness outside of mortgages or home-equity loans rose by 1.3 percent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The downside of that falling debt is that it could drive consumer spending downward right along with it. But that doesn't seem to have been the case. In that third quarter, the Fed reports, consumer spending rose by 2.3 percent, the biggest gain we've seen so far in 2011.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And what of the brand-new holiday shopping season? So far, so good: retail sales for the Thanksgiving weekend were up 16 percent over last year. Shoppers spent an average of nearly $400 apiece.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-7954761565660569849?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/7954761565660569849/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/debt-drops-but-not-spending.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7954761565660569849'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7954761565660569849'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/debt-drops-but-not-spending.html' title='Debt Drops, but Not Spending'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-5295187032514469351</id><published>2011-11-28T01:31:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-11-28T01:31:00.156-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Corporate Profits Continue to Surge</title><content type='html'>Though there are still troubled spots for this economy, one sign that augurs well for our future is that corporate profits continue to grow to record levels. The federal government released its estimate of corporate profits for the third quarter last week, and reported them at an annual rate of $1.56 trillion. For the 12 months that ended in September, corporate profits increased by 11.4 percent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That $1.56 trillion accounts for 10.3 percent of our entire gross domestic product, up slightly from 10.1 percent in the second quarter. That's an enormous share of our economy. Prior to last year, the biggest share of GDP ever taken up by corporate profits was in 1929, when they topped out at 8.98 percent. As recently as 2008, that figure was down below 7 percent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then, in 2010, corporate profits grew to a then-record of 9.56 percent. Their current level marks the first time ever that they have reached 10 percent of GDP. The next question will be to see what our companies intend to do with all those profits.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-5295187032514469351?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/5295187032514469351/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/corporate-profits-continue-to-surge.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/5295187032514469351'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/5295187032514469351'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/corporate-profits-continue-to-surge.html' title='Corporate Profits Continue to Surge'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-7606210323436499200</id><published>2011-11-25T04:12:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-11-25T04:12:00.259-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Happy Black Friday</title><content type='html'>Going shopping today? The nation's retailers certainly hope you have the dedication - and extra spending money - of those hardy souls who pitched a tent in front of a Best Buy in Union and camped out all Thanksgiving Day in anticipation of the Black Friday sales. Today is the day that many feel will tell the tale for the success or failure of the all-important Christmas shopping season.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What should we expect? &lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;  &lt;w:worddocument&gt;   &lt;w:view&gt;Normal&lt;/w:View&gt;   &lt;w:zoom&gt;0&lt;/w:Zoom&gt;   &lt;w:punctuationkerning/&gt;   &lt;w:validateagainstschemas/&gt;   &lt;w:saveifxmlinvalid&gt;false&lt;/w:SaveIfXMLInvalid&gt;   &lt;w:ignoremixedcontent&gt;false&lt;/w:IgnoreMixedContent&gt;   &lt;w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext&gt;false&lt;/w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText&gt;   &lt;w:compatibility&gt;    &lt;w:breakwrappedtables/&gt;    &lt;w:snaptogridincell/&gt;    &lt;w:wraptextwithpunct/&gt;    &lt;w:useasianbreakrules/&gt;    &lt;w:dontgrowautofit/&gt;   &lt;/w:Compatibility&gt;   &lt;w:browserlevel&gt;MicrosoftInternetExplorer4&lt;/w:BrowserLevel&gt;  &lt;/w:WordDocument&gt; &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;  &lt;w:latentstyles deflockedstate="false" latentstylecount="156"&gt;  &lt;/w:LatentStyles&gt; &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 10]&gt; &lt;style&gt;  /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable  {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";  mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;  mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;  mso-style-noshow:yes;  mso-style-parent:"";  mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;  mso-para-margin:0in;  mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;  mso-pagination:widow-orphan;  font-size:10.0pt;  font-family:"Times New Roman";  mso-ansi-language:#0400;  mso-fareast-language:#0400;  mso-bidi-language:#0400;} &lt;/style&gt; &lt;![endif]--&gt;The National Retail Federation forecasts sales in November and December to be up 2.8 percent over last year, which would be a solid rise but well below the 5.2 percent annual gain we saw in 2010. The NRF expects 152 million people to hit stores this weekend, up 10.1 percent from last year, which means there will be more people shopping, but each of them will be buying less.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The real action this year may be happening online. The research firm comScore estimates that Americans could spend $37.6 billion on e-commerce this holiday season, which would be up 15 percent from last year. The 2010 increase in online sales was just 12 percent.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-7606210323436499200?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/7606210323436499200/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/happy-black-friday.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7606210323436499200'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7606210323436499200'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/happy-black-friday.html' title='Happy Black Friday'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-8181244901692856408</id><published>2011-11-24T02:21:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-11-24T02:21:00.936-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Thoughts for Thanksgiving</title><content type='html'>&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;  &lt;w:worddocument&gt;   &lt;w:view&gt;Normal&lt;/w:View&gt;   &lt;w:zoom&gt;0&lt;/w:Zoom&gt;   &lt;w:punctuationkerning/&gt;   &lt;w:validateagainstschemas/&gt;   &lt;w:saveifxmlinvalid&gt;false&lt;/w:SaveIfXMLInvalid&gt;   &lt;w:ignoremixedcontent&gt;false&lt;/w:IgnoreMixedContent&gt;   &lt;w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext&gt;false&lt;/w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText&gt;   &lt;w:compatibility&gt;    &lt;w:breakwrappedtables/&gt;    &lt;w:snaptogridincell/&gt;    &lt;w:wraptextwithpunct/&gt;    &lt;w:useasianbreakrules/&gt;    &lt;w:dontgrowautofit/&gt;   &lt;/w:Compatibility&gt;   &lt;w:browserlevel&gt;MicrosoftInternetExplorer4&lt;/w:BrowserLevel&gt;  &lt;/w:WordDocument&gt; &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;  &lt;w:latentstyles deflockedstate="false" latentstylecount="156"&gt;  &lt;/w:LatentStyles&gt; &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 10]&gt; &lt;style&gt;  /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable  {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";  mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;  mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;  mso-style-noshow:yes;  mso-style-parent:"";  mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;  mso-para-margin:0in;  mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;  mso-pagination:widow-orphan;  font-size:10.0pt;  font-family:"Times New Roman";  mso-ansi-language:#0400;  mso-fareast-language:#0400;  mso-bidi-language:#0400;} &lt;/style&gt; &lt;![endif]--&gt;  &lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;“We often take for granted the very things that most deserve our gratitude.” ~ &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Cynthia Ozick&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;“You know that just before that first &lt;a href="http://www.businesspundit.com/25-quotable-thanksgiving-quotes/" id="KonaLink4" style="font-weight: inherit ! important; font-size: inherit ! important;"&gt;&lt;span class="klink"&gt;&lt;span style="color: windowtext; text-decoration: none;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: inherit ! important; font-size: inherit ! important;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: inherit ! important; font-size: inherit ! important;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Thanksgiving dinner there was one wise, old Native American woman saying, “Don’t feed them. If you feed them, they’ll never leave.” ~ &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Dylan Brody&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;“Thanksgiving was never meant to be shut up in a single day.” ~ &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Robert Caspar Lintner&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-8181244901692856408?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/8181244901692856408/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/thoughts-for-thanksgiving.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8181244901692856408'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8181244901692856408'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/thoughts-for-thanksgiving.html' title='Thoughts for Thanksgiving'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-7831068702090073048</id><published>2011-11-23T01:56:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-11-23T01:56:00.303-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Fed Gets Frustrated</title><content type='html'>The minutes from the Federal Reserve meeting earlier this month were released yesterday, and their disappointment with the direction of the economy was notable. Fed chairman Ben Bernanke called the pace of economic growth "frustratingly slow," and the Fed accordingly ratcheted down its forecasts for the coming year. It now sees GDP growing at 1.7 percent this year and 2.7 percent next year - and remember, it was making these predictions before the new came out that the official GDP rate for the third quarter was revised down from 2.5 percent to 2.0 percent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Fed also sees unemployment settling at 8.6 percent by the end of 2012. That means it expects little change over the next year, since the official rate is currently 9.0 percent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There wasn't any action taken after the meeting, but the overall sense of pessimism makes it more likely that the Fed will take future steps, perhaps a third bout of quantitative easing. The Fed next meets on December 13, and we'll keep an eye on that date.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-7831068702090073048?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/7831068702090073048/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/fed-gets-frustrated.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7831068702090073048'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7831068702090073048'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/fed-gets-frustrated.html' title='The Fed Gets Frustrated'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-4863807385002372462</id><published>2011-11-22T01:07:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-11-22T01:07:00.132-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Families Slowing Down</title><content type='html'>Everyone understands that the economic downturn has led to a decrease in family expenditures, but has it led to a decrease in families as well? According to the National Center for Health Statistics, American births fell to around 4 million last year, the lowest they've been in 11 years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Department of Agriculture estimates that it costs an average of $226,920 to raise a child to the age of 17. So it's no wonder people would put off having children till they feel a bit more financially secure. One ramification of this demographic slowdown, though, is that it's going to make a housing recovery all that much harder to come by. If people's families aren't growing, there's less incentive to buy a bigger house.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Other data bears out that hypothesis. The Census Bureau announced that the number of Americans who moved last year hit a historic low - the lowest the figure has been since they started tracking this number, back in 1948. Only 11.6 percent of all Americans found a new residence between 2010 and 2011. As recently as 1985, the number was nearly double that, at 20.2 percent.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-4863807385002372462?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/4863807385002372462/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/families-slowing-down.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/4863807385002372462'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/4863807385002372462'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/families-slowing-down.html' title='Families Slowing Down'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-5645347913366847032</id><published>2011-11-21T01:54:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-11-21T01:54:00.270-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Turkey Day Travel</title><content type='html'>Are you heading out of town for Thanksgiving this week? If so, you're not alone. According to the American Automobile Association, a total of 42.5 million Americans will be traveling at least 50 miles for their Thanksgiving celebrations this year. In a small sign of an improved economy, that's up from 40.9 million who traveled that far last year. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The vast majority of those travelers - 90 percent - will be driving, despite the fact that gasoline is much more expensive this year than it was in 2010. Nationwide, a gallon of gas will cost you an average of $3.43 right now, up from $2.55 at this time last year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Add it all up, and the median spending by an American Thanksgiving traveler this year is projected to be a not-insignificant $540.  That's a nice little boost to the economy as we head into the all-important holiday spending season.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-5645347913366847032?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/5645347913366847032/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/turkey-day-travel.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/5645347913366847032'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/5645347913366847032'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/turkey-day-travel.html' title='Turkey Day Travel'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-7151491669734931866</id><published>2011-11-18T01:47:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-11-18T01:47:00.221-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Phantom Taxes</title><content type='html'>Bernard Madoff's Ponzi scheme stole money from an awful lot of investors, and even those people who thought they were making money with Madoff turned out to have nothing more than phantom profits. To add insult to injury, some people even paid taxes on those nonexistent profits. But a couple from Middletown who paid New Jersey state taxes on those phantom profits has successfully gotten that money returned to them.&lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;John and Cathy Dalton had invested about $700,000 with Madoff. For several years, Madoff reported sizable capital gains to the Daltons, who dutifully paid taxes on it. After Madoff's scheme collapsed in 2008, the Daltons were only able to get $572,000 of their money back. They then filed amended tax returns to recoup the taxes they had paid on those phony capital gains.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At first, they were told no, they couldn't get a refund, because they technically could have cashed out their positions at any time before the Madoff scheme collapsed and enjoyed their gains. Finally, this week, a court ruled that the Daltons shouldn't have had to pay taxes on investment income that never really existed. The reward: a refund of $5,000 in capital gains taxes from the state of New Jersey.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-7151491669734931866?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/7151491669734931866/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/phantom-taxes.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7151491669734931866'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7151491669734931866'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/phantom-taxes.html' title='Phantom Taxes'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-2220295557257775268</id><published>2011-11-17T02:16:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-11-17T02:16:00.154-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Inflation Eases</title><content type='html'>Inflation seems to have ground to a halt in October, as the Labor Department statistics released yesterday showed that consumer prices dropped 0.1 percent for the month, after four months of increases. Core inflation - stripping out the more volatile food and fuel costs - rose by just 0.1 percent. Overall, consumer prices have increased by 3.5 percent in the past 12 months.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The biggest drops in prices for October came in the energy sector. Gasoline was down 3.1 percent on the month, but even so, it's still up 23.5 percent for the past year. On the other hand, utility gas service dropped a similar 3.0 percent in October, but it's now down 2.2 percent over the course of the year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For the full year, aside from energy prices, the biggest risers were used cars and trucks (up 5.2 percent), food (up 4.7 percent), and apparel (up 4.2 percent). Interestingly enough, the cost of food eaten at home was up more than twice as much as food eaten out, by a margin of 6.2 percent to 2.7 percent.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-2220295557257775268?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/2220295557257775268/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/inflation-eases.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/2220295557257775268'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/2220295557257775268'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/inflation-eases.html' title='Inflation Eases'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-2173686697950567594</id><published>2011-11-16T01:25:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-11-16T01:25:01.110-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Hedge Funds Rise, Even in a Down Year</title><content type='html'>With the stock market showing an awful lot of unpredictability this year, many institutional investors have headed for hedge funds instead. These investors - including many pension plans - have put nearly $40 billion into hedge funds in 2011, as of last week, according to &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Pensions &amp;amp; Investments&lt;/span&gt; magazine. That's up 24 percent from the inflows we saw in 2010.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The record year for institutional inflows into hedge funds looks unbeatable, though. That was in 2007, when there was more than $66 billion of such assets put into hedge funds.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The funny thing about all of that money entering these funds this year is that 2011 has been very weak for hedge funds. According to the HFRI index, total hedge fund returns were flat through the first half of the year - up just 0.76 percent - then cratered in the third quarter, when they dropped by 5.5 percent. All told, the hedge fund index shows a net loss of 3.33 percent on the year.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-2173686697950567594?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/2173686697950567594/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/hedge-funds-rise-even-in-down-year.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/2173686697950567594'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/2173686697950567594'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/hedge-funds-rise-even-in-down-year.html' title='Hedge Funds Rise, Even in a Down Year'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-9209536287500704218</id><published>2011-11-15T01:13:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-11-15T01:13:00.290-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Buybacks on the Rise</title><content type='html'>You can add one more entity to the list of people who are buying stock heavily these days: Corporations themselves are buying back their own stock at near-record levels. American businesses have bought back more than $450 billion of their own stock so far in 2011, putting this year on pace to be the third-highest such year on record, behind only 2006 and 2007. And with corporations like Apple sitting on record amounts of cash, we might even see those rates increase.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;American companies spent 70 percent more money on buying their own stock in the third quarter than they had a year ago. Among those businesses getting in on the act is Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway, which started a buyback program in September, for the first time in the more than 40 years that Buffett has controlled it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What does it mean? The immediate reading to take from buybacks is that corporate management is feeling confident about their prospects and the economy at large. They must feel that their companies are either undervalued or on the verge of growth. At the same time, though, their record of prognostication is hardly stellar: Note that the last time we saw this level of buybacks, it was 2007 and we were headed into recession.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-9209536287500704218?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/9209536287500704218/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/buybacks-on-rise.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/9209536287500704218'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/9209536287500704218'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/buybacks-on-rise.html' title='Buybacks on the Rise'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-1042961371949274019</id><published>2011-11-14T02:49:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-11-14T02:49:00.273-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Boomers Worry About Their Retirement</title><content type='html'>As the Baby Boom generation nears retirement, it shouldn't come as any surprise - given the financial landscape of the past few years - that many of them aren't thinking of retiring at all. A new poll of Americans born between 1946 and 1964 shows that 27 percent of them now expect to never retire. Another 16 percent plan to work till at least the age of 70, which means that nearly half of Baby Boomers will be working into their septuagenarian years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's clear that what's primarily driving these decisions is fear. Nearly a third of the Baby Boomers surveyed said that they fully expect to struggle financially in their retirement years.  Another 41 percent say they expect to scale back their lifestyle in a significant manner during their retirement.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Surprisingly, just 33 percent of these Baby Boomers say they have devoted a "great deal of thought" to their retirement. Maybe if the other two thirds had devoted more of their attention to retirement planning, they wouldn't be so worried about it. If you feel like your retirement planning needs a bit more attention, feel free to give me a call.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-1042961371949274019?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/1042961371949274019/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/boomers-worry-about-their-retirement.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/1042961371949274019'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/1042961371949274019'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/boomers-worry-about-their-retirement.html' title='Boomers Worry About Their Retirement'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-6660327235209257765</id><published>2011-11-11T01:23:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-11-11T01:23:00.214-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Christmas Tree Tax</title><content type='html'>As if you're not getting taxed enough already, there was a story going around this week about a special new tax that many of us would be paying over the next month or so: a Christmas tree tax. And the story is true: There really was a plan to assess a tax of 15 cents on each Christmas tree sold.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the story comes with a couple of caveats. For one thing, the whole scheme was the brainchild of the private Christmas Tree Task Force, which wanted to set up a program in partnership with the USDA to help promote the sales of Christmas trees, along the lines of the milk producers' "Got Milk?" campaign. The 15-cent assessment was supposed to go toward funding those efforts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;More importantly, even though the Christmas tree producers themselves wanted the program implemented, the hue and cry surrounding it was so great that the whole thing has been canceled. "I can tell you unequivocally," said a White House press secretary, "that the Obama administration is not taxing Christmas trees."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-6660327235209257765?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/6660327235209257765/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/christmas-tree-tax.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/6660327235209257765'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/6660327235209257765'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/christmas-tree-tax.html' title='The Christmas Tree Tax'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-5620973090631576334</id><published>2011-11-10T01:42:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-11-10T01:42:01.091-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Buffett Is Buying</title><content type='html'>At least one prominent investor took advantage of the disastrous third quarter to buy cheaply priced stocks: Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway invested $23.9 billion - $7 billion of it into equities - in that quarter alone. That's the most Buffett has invested in any quarter in at least 15 years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That $7 billion investment in stocks for the third quarter was up from $3.62 billion in the second quarter and a paltry $834 million in the first quarter. Although the specific list of stocks Berkshire Hathaway bought in the third quarter hasn't been released, we do know that the firm's position in banks, insurance and finance stocks rose 2.7 percent over the quarter, while its position in consumer stocks dropped by 5 percent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The last quarter in which Buffett's firm invested more than $20 billion was the fourth quarter of 2008. That bet may have been slightly premature, but it eventually paid off: The S&amp;amp;P 500, you'll remember, bottomed out in the first quarter of 2009 before coming back strong.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-5620973090631576334?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/5620973090631576334/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/buffett-is-buying.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/5620973090631576334'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/5620973090631576334'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/buffett-is-buying.html' title='Buffett Is Buying'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-4833667822955428877</id><published>2011-11-09T02:45:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-11-09T02:45:01.804-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Help Wanted</title><content type='html'>Despite the fact that last week's unemployment report wasn't particularly strong, there are signs on the horizon that we may be seeing an uptick in hiring over the next few months. The Labor Department reported yesterday that job openings increased by 225,000 in September, and now stand at 3.35 million. That's the highest they've been since August 2008 - a month before the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy triggered the meltdown of the nation's financial sector.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While we generally look at jobs added to see how the employment situation is changed, the hiring records are actually much larger than those numbers. Overall, employers hired 4.25 million workers in September, up from 4.06 million in August, although most of those were obviously already employed before they took on their new positions. Clearly, there are jobs out there.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Does that mean we'll see some improvement in the unemployment numbers in coming months? It's very possible. Some experts even think we could see an upward revision to October's relatively weak new-jobs figure of 80,000.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-4833667822955428877?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/4833667822955428877/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/help-wanted.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/4833667822955428877'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/4833667822955428877'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/help-wanted.html' title='Help Wanted'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-8292585898243117681</id><published>2011-11-08T01:31:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-11-08T01:31:00.356-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Vanguard Gets Confused</title><content type='html'>Investing can be a complicated endeavor for even the most studious individual investor. As a matter of fact, even big financial institutions like Vanguard get confused from time to time. The fund company recently reported on its Web site that in eight of the nine bear markets since 1960, the S&amp;amp;P 500 typically made most of those gains back within the following year.There's just one problem: That's not true, as the &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Wall Street Journal&lt;/span&gt; noted yesterday morning.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What Vanguard meant to say was that if the S&amp;amp;P lost 25 percent in a bear market, it would usually rally 25 percent within a year. But that doesn't bring the index back to where it started. The math doesn't work out. Consider if the S&amp;amp;P were at an even 1000, and lost 25 percent; that brings it down to 750. But a gain of 25 percent from a level of 750 only brings the index back up to 937.50. To get back to 1000 would require a gain of 33 percent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Unfortunately for Vanguard, the S&amp;amp;P hasn't shown that kind of resiliency. Only two of the eight bear markets that Vanguard reported as getting back to whole within a year actually made it that far.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-8292585898243117681?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/8292585898243117681/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/vanguard-gets-confused.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8292585898243117681'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8292585898243117681'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/vanguard-gets-confused.html' title='Vanguard Gets Confused'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-7324415301577586584</id><published>2011-11-07T03:45:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-11-07T03:45:00.664-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Fed's Jobs Outlook</title><content type='html'>Friday's unemployment report, in which the official jobless rate ticked down to 9.0 percent, must have come as a bit of a surprise to the Federal Reserve. Just two days earlier, the Federal Open Market Committee had issued a forecast saying that unemployment would be between 9.0 and 9.1 percent for the remainder of the year, meaning that they don't expect any further improvement in the jobless rate. That would be very disappointing. Even in 2012, the Fed thinks unemployment will remain between 8.6 and 8.9 percent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Fed did raise its inflation outlook for the rest of the year. After projecting in June that inflation would run between 1.5 percent and 1.8 percent throughout 2011, last week the Fed inched that forecast up to 1.8 to 1.9 percent. That shouldn't be interpreted as a trend, though; long-term, the Fed doesn't see inflation on the rise. Its inflation projection for 2012 is 1.5 to 2.0 percent, and for 2013 is even lower, at 1.4 to 1.9 percent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So the inflation forecast is good news for the economy, but the unemployment forecast is not. The Fed doesn't appear to have known when it made that forecast that the Labor Department would revise upward the jobs figures for August and September just two days later. Maybe that knowledge would have resulted in a rosier projection.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-7324415301577586584?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/7324415301577586584/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/feds-jobs-outlook.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7324415301577586584'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7324415301577586584'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/feds-jobs-outlook.html' title='The Fed&apos;s Jobs Outlook'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-6931000019891224304</id><published>2011-11-04T05:40:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-11-04T05:52:21.393-07:00</updated><title type='text'>October's Jobs Figures</title><content type='html'>This morning's jobs report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics was more of the "one step up, one step back" phenomenon we've been seeing in the unemployment figures for some time now. Taken at face value, the addition of 80,000 jobs to the economy in October looks pretty feeble; it's the fewest number of jobs we've added in four months, and was below most economists' estimates.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the same time, though, the official unemployment rate ticked down, from 9.1 percent to 9.0 percent. We've seen such anomalies in the past, with a small number of jobs being accompanied by a reduction in the overall unemployment rate. Sometimes, it's a result of people leaving the labor force and shrinking the overall number of employed persons, which is obviously not good for the economy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But this month's figures are different: The biggest reason the unemployment number dropped is because the jobs figures for both August and September were revised upward. Instead of the original figure of 57,000 jobs added to nonfarm payroll employment in August, the government now says it was actually 104,000, and September was bumped up from 103,000 to 158,000. In other words, hiring was stronger than initially thought throughout the late summer, and the unemployment rate probably ticked down at some point back then.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the other hand, those stronger months in the recent past make the October figure a little more disappointing. Maybe it too will get revised upward at some point.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-6931000019891224304?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/6931000019891224304/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/octobers-jobs-figures.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/6931000019891224304'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/6931000019891224304'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/octobers-jobs-figures.html' title='October&apos;s Jobs Figures'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-3106760011679418828</id><published>2011-11-03T01:03:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-11-03T01:03:00.832-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Long-Term, Bonds Inch Ahead of Stocks</title><content type='html'>After a lost decade in the stock markets (you can read more about it &lt;a href="http://www.echelonwealth.com/articlePopUp.asp?articlesNo=26"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;), we have reached a most unlikely anomaly in long-term investing: As of the end of October, over the past 30 years, returns on long-term Treasury bonds have outpaced returns from equities. How unlikely is that? We hadn't seen such a 30-year period since before the Civil War, with a stretch that ended in 1861.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the most recent 30-year period, the S&amp;amp;P 500 has gained an average of 10.8 percent on an annual basis. But long-term government bonds have gained an average of 11.5 percent over the same period, according to a study conducted by Bianco Research in Chicago.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Those same trends have remained strongly in force this year, although at a lower level. Bond investments have returned 6.25 percent this year through the end of October, while the S&amp;amp;P 500 is up 2.18 percent.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-3106760011679418828?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/3106760011679418828/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/long-term-bonds-inch-ahead-of-stocks.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/3106760011679418828'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/3106760011679418828'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/long-term-bonds-inch-ahead-of-stocks.html' title='Long-Term, Bonds Inch Ahead of Stocks'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-3272588296222289356</id><published>2011-11-02T01:23:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-11-02T01:23:00.077-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Investors Are Returning</title><content type='html'>Despite the disastrous third quarter in the markets, we're seeing signs of renewed optimism among investors. In September, for instance, for the first time in three months, more money flowed into mutual funds than came out of them. The biggest winner: Taxable bond funds, which took in $3.5 billion for the month.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the same time, though, reversals in the markets kept total mutual fund investments down. By the end of September, the total amount of assets in U.S. mutual funds was at a yearly low of just $7.4 trillion. ETFs showed a similar pattern: Asset flows into them were positive in September, but they still fell to a yearly low total investment of $956 billion. That was the first time all year they had dropped below $1 trillion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These are all figures for September, remember. That optimism on the part of fund investors was rewarded; the S&amp;amp;P 500 returned 11.8 percent in October, its strongest month since 2009.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-3272588296222289356?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/3272588296222289356/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/investors-are-returning.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/3272588296222289356'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/3272588296222289356'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/investors-are-returning.html' title='Investors Are Returning'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-158576534205534495</id><published>2011-11-01T02:36:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-11-01T02:36:00.073-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Jon Corzine and the Volcker Rule</title><content type='html'>The bankruptcy of the investment bank MF Global, under the guidance of our former governor Jon Corzine, has highlighted the way the so-called Volcker Rule is supposed to protect our economy from the failure of "too big to fail" financial institutions.  The Volcker Rule, which is scheduled to take effect next year, only  affects institutions that are much larger than MF, but the principle is  the same: Banks or financial firms that have government  guarantees, or are so deeply entwined in the financial markets that  their collapse threatens the entire system, should not be allowed to  make such risky bets that could bring them down.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The collapse of MF resulted from unwisely betting $6.3 billion on European sovereign debt, when the firm itself had only $2.5 billion in capital. If a larger firm like Goldman Sachs had lost proportionally as much money as MF Global, and fell into bankruptcy, our financial system would be in great peril.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And the big investment banks often lose huge sums of money. As part of the research into implementing the Volcker Rule,  the government looked at the proprietary-trading desks at six major investment banks. Over the 18 quarters studied, the desks turned a total profit of $15.6 billion in 13 of the 18 quarters. But in the remaining five quarters, the traders lost a total of $15.8 billion. As profitable as these investment banks usually are, when their trades go bad, they can go really bad, really fast.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-158576534205534495?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/158576534205534495/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/jon-corzine-and-volcker-rule.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/158576534205534495'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/158576534205534495'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/11/jon-corzine-and-volcker-rule.html' title='Jon Corzine and the Volcker Rule'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-2752460475151522406</id><published>2011-10-31T02:00:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-31T02:00:12.250-07:00</updated><title type='text'>A Happy, Happy Halloween</title><content type='html'>Today is Halloween, which often serves as a sort of barometer for how the all-important holiday spending season will play out over the next two months. And if form holds, we could be in for a terrific holiday. According to the National Retail Federation, the average American plans to spend $72.31 on Halloween decorations, candy and costumes this year, which  is up more than 9 percent from last year and is the highest figure in the nine-year history of the survey. All told, spending on Halloween is expected to reach $6.86 billion this year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interestingly enough, Americans will spend more money on adult costumes this year - $1.21 billion - than on children's costumes - $1 billion. Those numbers were $990 million and $840 million last year. We'll also spend an additional $310 million this year on costumes for our pets.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And the most popular costume? We can expect to see roughly 2.6 million zombies rising from the dead this year, then roaming the streets of America asking for candy.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-2752460475151522406?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/2752460475151522406/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/happy-happy-halloween.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/2752460475151522406'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/2752460475151522406'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/happy-happy-halloween.html' title='A Happy, Happy Halloween'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-104231989318299165</id><published>2011-10-27T22:11:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-28T02:07:39.568-07:00</updated><title type='text'>GDP Comes Back Strong</title><content type='html'>Thursday's report on third-quarter GDP growth was the strongest we've seen in some time. In historic terms, 2.5 percent growth is fairly normal, but in these beleaguered times, it was the most growth we've seen in a year, and nearly doubled the second quarter's 1.3 percent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The biggest growth trigger was personal consumption expenditures, which grew 2.4 percent in the quarter after growing just 0.7 percent in the second quarter. Sales of computers accounted for 0.21 percentage points of the growth in GDP after adding 0.07 percentage points in the second quarter. Motor vehicles had accounted for a 0.10 percentage-point drop in the second-quarter GDP, but rebounded to add 0.07 percentage points to this quarter's growth.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With this solid quarter, we've turned a significant corner: The overall economy has now surpassed the size it was prior to the recession. Our inflation-adjusted gross domestic product totals roughly $13.35 trillion at this point. The size of the economy had peaked at around $13.33 trillion towards the end of 2007, before contracting in the recession.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-104231989318299165?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/104231989318299165/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/gdp-comes-back-strong.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/104231989318299165'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/104231989318299165'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/gdp-comes-back-strong.html' title='GDP Comes Back Strong'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-8124644202091635644</id><published>2011-10-27T01:36:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-27T01:36:00.221-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Venture Capital Roars Back</title><content type='html'>Much ink has been spilled over the exceptionally poor performance of the stock market during the third quarter of 2011, but there's one area that turned in strong numbers over that period: venture capital. U.S. venture capital firms poured a total of $8.4 billion into 765 start-ups during the third quarter. The dollar figure represents an increase of 29 percent over the third quarter of 2010.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The biggest winner was the consumer information services category, which includes such things as online search firms and social media. Those businesses received more than a billion dollars from venture capital firms in the quarter, in a total of 103 different deals. That's more than double the dollar figure raised in the same quarter last year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to Dow Jones VentureSource, which compiled the numbers, venture-capital activity is now on a pace to return to pre-recession levels by the end of the year. That could be a big jump-start for this sluggish economy.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-8124644202091635644?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/8124644202091635644/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/venture-capital-roars-back.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8124644202091635644'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8124644202091635644'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/venture-capital-roars-back.html' title='Venture Capital Roars Back'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-2788223399403817353</id><published>2011-10-26T03:01:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-26T03:01:00.518-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Consumer Confidence: A Double-Barreled Drop</title><content type='html'>It's not just retirement confidence that's dropping; consumer confidence is also falling, now reaching its lowest levels since we were in the midst of the recession. The most widely watched confidence reading, conducted by the Conference Board, has two basic measures, a current index and a future index, and usually the overall measure declines when one or the other drops. But in the October reading, people have gotten more pessimistic about both the present and the future.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The percentage of people who expect business conditions to be better in six months declined, as did the percentage of people who expect their income to decrease over the next six months. On the other side of the coin,  the number of people saying that business conditions are bad right now increased in October, as did the number of people saying that jobs are "not so plentiful."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While these consumer confidence numbers provide a lot of insight into where consumer spending might be headed, it's important to realize that the people surveyed are random Americans, who don't have any special insight into the economy. For instance, the same survey found that inflation expectations over the next 12 months are at 5.8 percent. While anything is possible in this economy, the annual inflation rate hasn't actually been that high since 1982.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-2788223399403817353?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/2788223399403817353/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/consumer-confidence-double-barreled.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/2788223399403817353'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/2788223399403817353'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/consumer-confidence-double-barreled.html' title='Consumer Confidence: A Double-Barreled Drop'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-4978458234691395725</id><published>2011-10-25T02:27:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-25T02:27:00.262-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Drop in Retirement Confidence</title><content type='html'>Americans' confidence in their ability to retire comfortably has been declining lately, according to the annual retirement survey conducted by SunLife Financial. That's no surprise, given the economic environment we've been living in the past few years. What is surprising, though, is the timing. While the confidence level stayed relatively stable from 2008 to 2010, it dropped suddenly by 18 percent in 2011.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The thing that's changed is people's confidence in their ability to pay for their basic living expenses in retirement. In December 2008, after the recession had already been in effect for a year, 46 percent of Americans said they were very confident they'd be able to pay for their retirement expenses. Only 14 percent said they were "not at all" confident.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now those numbers have reversed. In the 2011 survey, more respondents - 28 percent - said they were not at all confident about their retirement than those who said they were very confident (23 percent). The biggest issue here may be a lack of confidence in government: Confidence about Social Security has dropped from 22 percent in 2008 to 9 percent now, and confidence about Medicare has dropped from 20 percent to 8 percent.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-4978458234691395725?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/4978458234691395725/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/drop-in-retirement-confidence.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/4978458234691395725'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/4978458234691395725'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/drop-in-retirement-confidence.html' title='The Drop in Retirement Confidence'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-8482334510693447602</id><published>2011-10-24T02:56:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-24T02:56:00.099-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Europe's Next Steps</title><content type='html'>The Greek debt crisis has been festering for more than a year now - when and how is it ever going to end? According to a poll of mutual fund managers conducted by Bank of America Merrill Lynch, the overwhelmingly expected result is a default. Three quarters of the respondents expect it to happen by the first quarter of 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Yet, by and large, they don't expect this event to be too traumatic for the American economy. The majority of respondents did forecast that Europe is likely to be thrown into recession by a Greek default, yet only 25 percent expect that to turn into a global recession. That's down from 40 percent that expected a global recession as recently as September.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So a Greek default may not be as dangerous as it sounds. In one sense, it would be an opportunity to put the immediate problem behind us, and the European governments can get back to focusing on growing their economies rather than pursuing endless bailouts of Greece. In the long term, that might be the best remedy for all.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-8482334510693447602?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/8482334510693447602/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/europes-next-steps.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8482334510693447602'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8482334510693447602'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/europes-next-steps.html' title='Europe&apos;s Next Steps'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-8419102552060360087</id><published>2011-10-21T01:43:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-21T01:43:00.126-07:00</updated><title type='text'>IRS Guidelines for 2012</title><content type='html'>The IRS has issued some announcements on updated regulations for 2012, and there is some good news in there for retirement savings. The limit on 401(k)s has been raised from $16,500 this year to $17,000 next year, so you will be able to put away another $500 tax-free. That applies to 403(b) plans, for people who work for nonprofits, as well.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There are also some cost-of-living adjustments that should provide a small amount of tax relief for high-income taxpayers. The personal exemption will rise from $3,700 to $3,800, and the standard deduction for married couples will go up from $11,600 to $11,900. And the 35 percent top bracket will now apply to incomes of $388,350 and higher, up from $379,150 this year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There is also some small movement on the estate tax, which his been a moving target for the past few years. The exemption will be raised to $5.12 million next year, up from $5 million. But be warned: At this point, that exemption is scheduled to drop back to $1 million at the end of 2012, unless more legislation is passed.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-8419102552060360087?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/8419102552060360087/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/irs-guidelines-for-2012.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8419102552060360087'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/8419102552060360087'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/irs-guidelines-for-2012.html' title='IRS Guidelines for 2012'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-1611957411777380354</id><published>2011-10-20T01:28:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-20T01:28:00.767-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Behind Apple's "Big Miss"</title><content type='html'>All the reports about Apple's disappointing quarterly results - the &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Wall Street Journal&lt;/span&gt; headline read "Apple Loses Some of Its Shine" - serve as a reminder about what really moves markets in the near term. Apple's problems weren't that it had poor sales or revenue in the third quarter. The problem was that it didn't live up to Wall Street's lofty expectations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Consider that the quarter saw record sales of both Macintosh computers and iPads. The overall revenue for the quarter was $28.3 billion, the second-best quarter on record for Apple. Revenues were up year-over-year by 39 percent. Profits were up by 54 percent. There's nothing wrong with any of that; the issue is that the analysts' consensus expected earnings to be 3 percent higher than they actually were.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As a result, Apple lost 6.5 percent off its share price in after-hours trading on Tuesday following the earnings report. But for long-term investors, missing (or meeting) Wall Street's quarterly expectations should be merely a blip.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-1611957411777380354?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/1611957411777380354/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/behind-apples-big-miss.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/1611957411777380354'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/1611957411777380354'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/behind-apples-big-miss.html' title='Behind Apple&apos;s &quot;Big Miss&quot;'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-1384118202136442685</id><published>2011-10-19T02:59:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-19T02:59:00.298-07:00</updated><title type='text'>A Jumpstart for Housing?</title><content type='html'>The housing market may be receiving a significant boost from an unusual source: a rise in short sales. Short sales, as you may know, arise when a home is in default but hasn't been officially foreclosed upon, and the bank decides to let the owner sell it for less than the mortgage balance rather than repossess it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to RealtyTrac, short sales were up 19 percent in the second quarter of this year, while foreclosures were flat. HomeServices of America, a residential brokerage, says it now sees about 60 percent short sales and 40 percent foreclosures, whereas those figures used to be reversed. It's not much of a surprise that short sales would be preferred by banks: They generally end up selling at a discount of about 20 percent, compared to similar homes not in default. Foreclosures typically carry a discount of around 40 percent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And then there's the time saved. As we mentioned recently, foreclosures in New Jersey take an average of around two and a half years. Speeding up that process will help clear the excess inventory off the market, and get everything moving again.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-1384118202136442685?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/1384118202136442685/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/jumpstart-for-housing.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/1384118202136442685'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/1384118202136442685'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/jumpstart-for-housing.html' title='A Jumpstart for Housing?'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-2955903193060894634</id><published>2011-10-18T03:20:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-18T03:20:00.318-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Industrial Strength</title><content type='html'>The likelihood of a double-dip recession got a little more remote yesterday, with the news that industrial  production in the United States grew in the month of September. The growth in output at factories, mines and utilities was nothing great - just 0.2 percent - but it was up from being flat in August. The biggest movers were increasing demand for automobiles and computers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the first half of 2011, the industrial numbers had slowed to practically nothing. The indicators had shown that, for those six months, our industrial output was the weakest it had been since the onset of the recession in 2007.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So the fact that the numbers have reversed direction is very good news indeed. The growth in industrial output led the chief market strategist for JP Morgan to estimate that we'll see an increase in GDP for the third quarter somewhere between 2 and 3 percent. For the second quarter, remember, it was just 1.3 percent.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-2955903193060894634?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/2955903193060894634/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/industrial-strength.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/2955903193060894634'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/2955903193060894634'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/industrial-strength.html' title='Industrial Strength'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-200160662097121464</id><published>2011-10-17T01:09:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-17T11:21:13.730-07:00</updated><title type='text'>What Has You Worried?</title><content type='html'>It's no secret that American investors harbor great doubts about the stock market at the moment. A Gallup poll conducted during September asked people what exactly it was that had them so pessimistic. Not surprisingly, given all that's wrong with the economy right now, they were able to mention more than one item.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here are the factors that more than half the investors cited as reasons for their concern:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Unemployment; weak economy: 85 percent&lt;br /&gt;Volatility on Wall Street: 80 percent&lt;br /&gt;Confrontational political stalemate: 74 percent&lt;br /&gt;Lack of national leadership: 71 percent&lt;br /&gt;Federal Reserve policies: 51 percent&lt;br /&gt;Financial crisis in Europe: 50 percent&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-200160662097121464?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/200160662097121464/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/what-has-you-worried.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/200160662097121464'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/200160662097121464'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/what-has-you-worried.html' title='What Has You Worried?'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-4798055963203033025</id><published>2011-10-14T02:21:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-14T02:21:00.158-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Sloppy Bank Robber of the Week</title><content type='html'>Here's a lesson for all you would-be bank robbers: Work on your handwriting. Last week, a man walked into a bank branch down in New Castle, Delaware, and handed the teller a note. She couldn't read the writing on the note, so she handed it back to him and asked him if he could rewrite it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Apparently, he wasn't just asking for his account balance. The teller's request completely spooked the man, who fled from the bank on foot. A local police officer spotted him, though, and arrested him. The man is now being held on charges of attempted robbery.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Let that be a lesson to you. If you ever walk into a bank and give the teller a note asking what their 90-day CD rates are, make sure you write very clearly.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-4798055963203033025?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/4798055963203033025/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/sloppy-bank-robber-of-week.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/4798055963203033025'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/4798055963203033025'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/sloppy-bank-robber-of-week.html' title='Sloppy Bank Robber of the Week'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-1170243322466847088</id><published>2011-10-13T02:30:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-13T02:30:00.577-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Settling In to Earnings Season</title><content type='html'>Third-quarter earnings season is underway, and if the analysts are to be believed, this one could be a doozy. The analysts' consensus calls for profits to grow 13 percent for this quarter over the third quarter of 2011. The forecast also calls for fourth-quarter profits for S&amp;amp;P 500 companies to edge up even further, to 15 percent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As of the beginning of this week, 29 companies in the S&amp;amp;P 500 had announced their earnings, and 21 had beaten the analysts' estimates. That's a mark of 72 percent, but remember, the average percentage of companies that beat analysts' earnings estimates is 61 percent. So we're above average, but not by as much as that 72 percent might suggest.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the other hand, the Web site Thestreet.com looked at all the companies that had pre-announced earnings guidance in recent weeks, and found that the ratio of negative-to-positive news was 2.6 to 1. That might sound terrible, but again, those numbers are ordinarily skewed. The average figure is 2.3 to 1, so the number of companies reporting bad news is only a little bit higher than normal.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-1170243322466847088?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/1170243322466847088/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/settling-in-to-earnings-season.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/1170243322466847088'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/1170243322466847088'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/settling-in-to-earnings-season.html' title='Settling In to Earnings Season'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-9087460156058350795</id><published>2011-10-12T02:18:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-12T02:18:00.737-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Managing Social Security</title><content type='html'>American recognize that we are l iving longer, and thus will be spending more of our lives  in retirement. That's the good news from the new MetLife Retirement Income IQ survey. The bad news is that many people still don't seem fully prepared for how they're going to pay for those extra years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Take Social Security. A full 45 percent of the respondents said that Social Security would be an important part of their retirement scenario. But only 17 percent knew that by delaying when you begin accepting that retirement benefit by three years, you can add 24 percent to your annual total.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The reason that's so important is because Social Security is guaranteed to last till the end of your life, and it's indexed to inflation. If you can maximize those benefits to where you're receiving, say, $30,000 a year, and you live in retirement for 25 years, with a little inflation adjustment, Social Security can be a nearly million-dollar proposition. That means you should manage it with the care and attention you would put toward any other million-dollar aspect of your portfolio.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-9087460156058350795?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/9087460156058350795/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/managing-social-security.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/9087460156058350795'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/9087460156058350795'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/managing-social-security.html' title='Managing Social Security'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-6466144694134846147</id><published>2011-10-11T02:13:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-11T02:13:00.105-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Short Sales on the Rise</title><content type='html'>Last week we talked about the volatility index, an indicator that the stock market might be due for an upswing. Here's the other side of the equation: in the month of October, short selling increased at its quickest pace since 2006. Borrowed shares, the sign of a short sale, now constitute 11.6 percent of outstanding shares on the American market. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Overall, the percent of short sales is at its highest level since 2009. About 4.1 percent of the shares on the NYSE have already been borrowed and sold, up from 3.5 percent in July. Since short selling is a bet that a stock will decrease in price, this can be taken as an indicator of a further market decline.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Of course, that's only one indicator. Bloomberg News yesterday released the results of a poll of economists, who predicted that the S&amp;amp;P 500 would grow by 13 percent between now and the end of the year. If that happens, there are going to be a lot of disappointed short-sellers out there.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-6466144694134846147?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/6466144694134846147/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/short-sales-on-rise.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/6466144694134846147'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/6466144694134846147'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/short-sales-on-rise.html' title='Short Sales on the Rise'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-6107790277888671215</id><published>2011-10-10T01:55:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-10T01:55:00.780-07:00</updated><title type='text'>A Dismal Third Quarter</title><content type='html'>The third quarter of 2011, which ended a week ago, was a disaster for the stock markets. What's becoming clear as more detailed figures become available is how thorough the downturn was. Every equity category and every sector, lost ground.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here are how some mutual-fund sectors made it through the third quarter:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Precious-Metals Stocks: Down 6.2 percent&lt;br /&gt;Utilities: Down 6.6 percent&lt;br /&gt;Health: Down 13.5 percent&lt;br /&gt;Real Estate: Down 14.7 percent&lt;br /&gt;Technology: Down 15.9 percent&lt;br /&gt;Financial: Down 20.2 percent&lt;br /&gt;Industrials: Down 21.3 percent&lt;br /&gt;Energy stocks: Down 21.3 percent&lt;br /&gt;Natural Resources: Down 25.9 percent&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Did anything survive the quarter unscathed? According to the &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;New York Times&lt;/span&gt;, there was one general U.S. stock fund that finished in positive territory: The Hussman Strategic Total Return fund. It gained 2.4 percent.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-6107790277888671215?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/6107790277888671215/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/dismal-third-quarter.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/6107790277888671215'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/6107790277888671215'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/dismal-third-quarter.html' title='A Dismal Third Quarter'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-1328137053660145444</id><published>2011-10-07T05:37:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-07T06:02:10.769-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The New Jobless Figures</title><content type='html'>September brought us another month of increasing payrolls, but not enough of an increase to make a dent in the unemployment rate, according to figures released this morning by the Labor Department. U.S. payrolls added 103,000 jobs for the month, although the official jobless rate remained stuck at 9.1 percent. The government also revised upward the jobs figure for August; it now turns out that we added 57,000 jobs that month, instead of the zero figure that was originally reported.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The breakdown for September was that the private sector added 137,000 jobs, while government payrolls fell by 34,000. The biggest-gaining sectors were service providers, who added 85,000 jobs on the month, and construction, which added 26,000. There was a decline of 13,000 factory jobs, the biggest loss in that category since August 2010.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the trend is in the right direction, 103,000 new jobs a month is really only enough to tread water in a growing population. Economists estimate that we need to create closer to 200,000 jobs a month to really make a difference in the unemployment rate. The trend is in the right direction, but we aren't quite there yet.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-1328137053660145444?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/1328137053660145444/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/new-jobless-figures.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/1328137053660145444'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/1328137053660145444'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/new-jobless-figures.html' title='The New Jobless Figures'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-5235564507756023378</id><published>2011-10-06T03:31:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-06T03:31:00.691-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Steve Jobs, 1955-2011</title><content type='html'>With the news yesterday that Apple founder and longtime CEO Steve Jobs had passed away, there was also a sense that we might never see the likes of this sort of business titan again. Unlike his contemporary, Bill Gates of Microsoft, Jobs not only founded Apple (and was fired by his hand-picked successor) but remained critical to the day-to-day operations of the company, nearly to the end of his life. It's hard to think of another American business that was so innovative and influential - and successful - due to the efforts of one man.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here's a quick timeline of Jobs' life work:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;April 1, 1976: Steve Jobs co-founds Apple Computer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;December 1980: Apple goes public in the biggest IPO since Ford Motor in 1956, with a market valuation of $1.8 billion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;January 24, 1984: The Macintosh goes on sale to the public.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;May 1985: Jobs is fired from Apple. The company's split-adjusted stock price is about 2.5.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1996: Apple announces it has bought Jobs' company NeXT, bringing him back to the fold.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;September 16, 1997:  Jobs becomes CEO of Apple once again. The company's split-adjusted stock price is 5.4.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;November 10, 2001: The iPod goes on sale to the public. Apple's share price is at 9.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;June 29, 2007: The iPhone goes on sale to the public. Apple's share price is at 122.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;October 5, 2011: Steve Jobs dies. Apple's share price is at 377. Its market cap of $350 billion makes it the second-largest corporation in America after ExxonMobil.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you had bought 100 shares of Apple on the day Steve Jobs was re-introduced as the company's CEO, your $540 investment would now be worth $37,700.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-5235564507756023378?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/5235564507756023378/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/steve-jobs-1955-2011.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/5235564507756023378'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/5235564507756023378'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/steve-jobs-1955-2011.html' title='Steve Jobs, 1955-2011'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-4462795490467667787</id><published>2011-10-05T02:48:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-05T02:48:00.429-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Promise of Volatility</title><content type='html'>Are you looking for a sign that the stock market is due for a turnaround? There might be a good omen out there now, in the form of the Chicago Board Options Exchange's Volatility Index. The VIX has pushed itself above 40 for the third quarter, a jump of 160 percent, and is now in a territory that has historically predicted market upswings.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since 1990, in those periods when the VIX has closed above 40 - which it only does around 3 percent of the time - the S&amp;amp;P 500 has returned 3.2 percent on average over the next three months. And over the ensuing 12 months, the S&amp;amp;P has historically returned 19 percent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The volatility index looks at the prices paid for options that are designed to protect investors from losses in equity investments. It's a contrarian indicator, in that it shows that individual investors are fearing the worst - which means the market has turned into a good buy. That's the theory anyway; we'll see how well it holds up this time.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-4462795490467667787?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/4462795490467667787/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/promise-of-volatility.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/4462795490467667787'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/4462795490467667787'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/promise-of-volatility.html' title='The Promise of Volatility'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-1331710268417011918</id><published>2011-10-04T01:16:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-04T01:16:01.050-07:00</updated><title type='text'>What's Ahead for Greece?</title><content type='html'>&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;The crisis in Europe continues to weigh down the markets here in the U.S., as investors have move from speculation over whether Greece will default toward strategies for minimizing the damage of that default. &lt;span style="font-family: Georgia; "&gt;Moody’s rating agency has already declared that the likelihood of a Greek default was “virtually 100 percent.” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia; "&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia; "&gt;At this point, the other European nations may very well let &lt;st1:country-region st="on"&gt;&lt;st1:place st="on"&gt;Greece&lt;/st1:place&gt;&lt;/st1:country-region&gt; default, writing off the billions of dollars it owes to other member nations. While that would mean a big financial hit for &lt;st1:country-region st="on"&gt;&lt;st1:place st="on"&gt;Greece&lt;/st1:place&gt;&lt;/st1:country-region&gt;’s lenders - primarily the continent’s central banks - it would also end the crisis in its current form. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia; "&gt;Perhaps a larger concern would be that a default would drive up interest rates for all the Eurozone countries. Many of them are in a precarious enough position that it might tip them over into default as well.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia; "&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" &gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia; "&gt;It would also likely mean &lt;st1:country-region st="on"&gt;&lt;st1:place st="on"&gt;Greece&lt;/st1:place&gt;&lt;/st1:country-region&gt; would exit from the euro and return to its own currency – which might, ironically, benefit its economy, with a cheaper currency driving up tourism and exports. Certainly, t&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia; "&gt;he longer the sense of impending doom hangs over the continent, and the more the can gets kicked down the road, the longer it will take for &lt;st1:place st="on"&gt;Europe&lt;/st1:place&gt; to return to economic growth. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Georgia"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-1331710268417011918?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/1331710268417011918/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/whats-ahead-for-greece.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/1331710268417011918'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/1331710268417011918'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/whats-ahead-for-greece.html' title='What&apos;s Ahead for Greece?'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-9148367811853422498</id><published>2011-10-03T03:30:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-05T15:31:13.040-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Bounceback in Retirement Funds</title><content type='html'>&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;  &lt;w:worddocument&gt;   &lt;w:view&gt;Normal&lt;/w:View&gt;   &lt;w:zoom&gt;0&lt;/w:Zoom&gt;   &lt;w:punctuationkerning/&gt;   &lt;w:validateagainstschemas/&gt;   &lt;w:saveifxmlinvalid&gt;false&lt;/w:SaveIfXMLInvalid&gt;   &lt;w:ignoremixedcontent&gt;false&lt;/w:IgnoreMixedContent&gt;   &lt;w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext&gt;false&lt;/w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText&gt;   &lt;w:compatibility&gt;    &lt;w:breakwrappedtables/&gt;    &lt;w:snaptogridincell/&gt;    &lt;w:wraptextwithpunct/&gt;    &lt;w:useasianbreakrules/&gt;    &lt;w:dontgrowautofit/&gt;   &lt;/w:Compatibility&gt;   &lt;w:browserlevel&gt;MicrosoftInternetExplorer4&lt;/w:BrowserLevel&gt;  &lt;/w:WordDocument&gt; &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;xml&gt;  &lt;w:latentstyles deflockedstate="false" latentstylecount="156"&gt;  &lt;/w:LatentStyles&gt; &lt;/xml&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if !mso]&gt;&lt;object classid="clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D" id="ieooui"&gt;&lt;/object&gt; &lt;style&gt; st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } &lt;/style&gt; &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 10]&gt; &lt;style&gt;  /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable  {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";  mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;  mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;  mso-style-noshow:yes;  mso-style-parent:"";  mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;  mso-para-margin:0in;  mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;  mso-pagination:widow-orphan;  font-size:10.0pt;  font-family:"Times New Roman";  mso-ansi-language:#0400;  mso-fareast-language:#0400;  mso-bidi-language:#0400;} &lt;/style&gt; &lt;![endif]--&gt;  &lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;Despite the fact that the economy remains very sluggish, there is some good news to report as far as retirement planning goes. After retirement plans took a huge hit in the market downturn of 2008-2009, people are starting to build up those nest eggs again. Over the past year, 41 percent of American workers say they have increased their contributions to their 401(k)s. That's up from 31 percent who did so in 2010.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That's been a part of a huge bounceback in overall retirement savings. After the nation lost a huge amount of money in 2008, the value of U.S. retirement assets has been growing steadily ever since. Here's the recent history of the total value of all the 401(k)s, IRA, pension plans and government plans in the U.S.:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2007: $17.9 trillion&lt;br /&gt;2008: $14.0 trillion&lt;br /&gt;2009: $16.1 trillion&lt;br /&gt;2010: $16.7 trillion&lt;br /&gt;2011: $18.2 trillion&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-9148367811853422498?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/9148367811853422498/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/bounceback-in-retirement-funds.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/9148367811853422498'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/9148367811853422498'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/10/bounceback-in-retirement-funds.html' title='The Bounceback in Retirement Funds'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-1033060325522870600</id><published>2011-09-30T00:36:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-09-30T00:36:00.308-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Final Revisions</title><content type='html'>After some rough economic times, we can at least end September on a high note: The Bureau of Economic Analysis has revised upward some of the GDP figures from earlier this year. It turns out that the pullback we thought we had experienced in the spring wasn't as severe as it had been reported. Second quarter GDP - which had been revised downward from 1.3 percent to 1.0 percent in August - has been revised back up to 1.3 percent in the government's third and final estimate.&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;What changed? The biggest culprit was consumer spending - which went in two different directions. Consumer spending on goods, especially durable goods such as motor vehicles, was one of the primary decliners for the quarter. (Business investment in equipment and software was also revised down.)  But consumer spending on &lt;i&gt;services&lt;/i&gt; was revised upward in the final set of figures. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Current-dollar GDP - which reflects the market value of the nation's output of goods and services - made an even bigger upward swing. That figure had dropped from 3.7 to 3.5 percent in the first set of revisions, but it has now been nudged up even further, to 4.0 percent.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;The first estimate for third-quarter GDP is due out on October 28. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-1033060325522870600?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/1033060325522870600/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/09/final-revisions.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/1033060325522870600'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/1033060325522870600'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/09/final-revisions.html' title='The Final Revisions'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-7205952583130574520</id><published>2011-09-29T01:15:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-09-29T01:15:00.950-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Silver Rules</title><content type='html'>The price of gold has seen some tumultuous days recently, losing ten percent of its value in less than a week and currently sitting about 15 percent off its peak. While that has been covered extensively, it hasn't been quite as widely reported that silver has taken even a bigger tumble: It's lost more than 25 percent of its value within the past week.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What happened to drive the price down? The answer may lie not so much in supply and demand as in margin rules. Buying an investment on margin, as you probably recall, means putting down only part of the purchase price, and borrowing the rest. The Shanghai Gold Exchange just last week raised the silver margin requirements by 20 percent, which apparently triggered the fall in price.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You might not attribute the drop solely to the rules of the Chinese market - except that there was another silver price plunge earlier in the year, right after the Chicago Mercantile Exchange raised its own margin requirements for silver. Yet another lesson in one of the most important principles of investing: The global supermarket is a complicated place.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-7205952583130574520?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/7205952583130574520/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/09/silver-rules.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7205952583130574520'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/7205952583130574520'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/09/silver-rules.html' title='The Silver Rules'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1694958584738662984.post-6608877764413958903</id><published>2011-09-28T02:18:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-09-28T02:18:00.495-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Consumer Spending Still Precarious</title><content type='html'>A report released yesterday from the Bureau of Labor Statistics helped to point up why our economic slowdown has been so difficult to recover from. According to the BLS, household income in 2010 dropped slightly, by 0.6 percent, from $62,857 to $62,481.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A decrease of around $400 per household shouldn't have a dramatic effect on the economy - except the drop in spending was worse than that. The average American household spent 2 percent less than it had in 2009, and that was coming off a spending drop of 2.8 percent from 2008.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That's why the consumer confidence numbers are so important. We've seen declines in consumer spending not just because Americans have less money, but because they're more reluctant to spend the money they do have. The Conference Board reported yesterday that consumer confidence was ever-so-slightly higher in September, posting a "marginal gain"; that's a good first step.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1694958584738662984-6608877764413958903?l=echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/feeds/6608877764413958903/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/09/consumer-spending-still-precarious.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/6608877764413958903'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1694958584738662984/posts/default/6608877764413958903'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://echelonwealthstrategies.blogspot.com/2011/09/consumer-spending-still-precarious.html' title='Consumer Spending Still Precarious'/><author><name>Mark Wade</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07291692800145595071</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
